Cited by 70Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyIntramuscular injections and effectsImmune responses and vaccinations

Mothers as active partners in the prevention of childhood diseases: maternal factors related to immunization status of preschool children in Italy

Impicciatore, Piero, Bosetti, Cristina, Schiavio, Stefano, Pandolfini, Chiara, Bonati, Maurizio·2000·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background We examined how maternal socio-demographic factors, together with mother's education, knowledge, and perception of immunizations, can affect the uptake of optional vaccinations of preschool children in Italy.Methods Interviews of Italian mothers were performed using a structured questionnaire administered by trained interviewers with no specific medical competence.Results A convenience sample of 1,035 mothers were interviewed. Fifty-nine percent of the respondents reported to have had their child immunized with the MMR vaccine and 54% reported to have had their child immunized against pertussis. In logistic regression analysis, three variables were significantly associated with both the immunization outcomes: mother's positive attitude toward immunization (OR = 1.69; IC 1.13-2.52 for pertussis; OR = 1.86, IC 1. 17-2.96 for MMR); mothers' residency in the North of the country (OR = 1.74; IC 1.32-2.30 for pertussis; OR = 1.63, IC 1.18-2.24 for MMR); and mother's receipt of satisfactory information on immunization (OR = 1.67; IC 1.15-2.21 for pertussis; OR = 2.25, IC 1. 47-3.43 for MMR). An immunization performed in recent years (after 1994), probably following the widespread use of acellular vaccine, was the most significant predictor for pertussis immunization (OR = 3.21; IC 2.43-4.24).Conclusions The findings suggest that mothers' attitudes, educational level, and socio-demographic characteristics, as well as socio-economic factors and local health policies, can influence children's immunization uptake. Health promotion, based on a partnership between parents and health professionals, should become a priority in Italian vaccination policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/pmed.2000.0677

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Impicciatore, P., Bosetti, C., Schiavio, S., Pandolfini, C., & Bonati, M.
Affiliations
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
Corresponding author
Bonati, Maurizio
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-07
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
49-55
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980174512
Cited by
70
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
childhood immunization, vaccine uptake, preschool children, MMR vaccine, pertussis vaccine, acellular pertussis vaccine, maternal education, sociodemographic factors, regional disparities, health promotion, Italy
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Child, Child, Preschool, Communicable Disease Control, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Immunization, Infant, Italy, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mothers, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sampling Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review