Cited by 34Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Managementmelanin and skin pigmentationMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

An Assessment of Factors Related to Tumor Thickness and Delay in Diagnosis of Melanoma in Southern Italy

Montella, M., Crispo, A., Grimaldi, M., De Marco, M.R., Ascierto, P.A., Parasole, R., Melucci, M.T., Silvestro, P. +1 more·2002·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Since survival of patients with melanoma is strongly correlated with the Breslow tumor thickness of the primary lesion, factors that influence stage at diagnosis and delay in diagnosis are considered to be crucial. To test the relationship between tumor thickness and some social and clinical variables (including diagnosis/treatment delay) and the relationship between the diagnosis/treatment delay and some clinical variables, we analyzed data on 530 patients with melanoma from our Institute.Methods In the analysis, Breslow tumor thickness was categorized into two categories (< or =1.49, > or =1.5). Three time intervals were examined to evaluate diagnostic delay: patient delay, time from first symptom to seeking medical advice; medical delay, time from first medical consultation to hospital admission; total delay, time from first symptom to resection. The variables evaluated in the analysis were: age at diagnosis, education, occupational status, first symptom, visibility of tumor, anatomic site, and physician who made the initial diagnosis.Results A significant risk of having a Breslow tumor thickness > or =1.5 mm was noted in patients who had a low level of education (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.9-5.0) or who were unemployed (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.8). With respect to patient delay, a delay >3 months for anatomic locations visible to patients was associated with significant risk (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.6); with respect to medical delay, a delay >3 months was associated with a higher risk in patients examined by a dermatologist (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.2-3.4).Conclusions Our results clearly indicate that in Southern Italy poorly educated and unemployed subjects are at risk of being diagnosed at a more advanced stage, and admission to an oncological hospital causes a delay (waiting list) in the time interval related to the doctor (medical delay).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/pmed.2002.1067

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montella, M., Crispo, A., Grimaldi, M., De Marco, M. R., Ascierto, P. A., Parasole, R., Melucci, M. T., Silvestro, P., & Fabbrocini, G.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
271-277
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031065931
Cited by
34
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
melanoma, delayed diagnosis, treatment delay, patient delay, socioeconomic factors, educational attainment, unemployment, dermatologist diagnosis, tumor visibility, Southern Italy
MeSH terms
Diagnostic Errors, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review