The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change
Abstract
Students engaged in learning a large body of related knowledge often possess some incorrect naïve knowledge about the domain. These “misconceptions” must be removed and/or the correct conception must be built in order for students to achieve a deep understanding. This repair process is generally referred to as “conceptual change.” However, although conceptual change has been discussed for several decades within different research contexts, the literature nevertheless presents a somewhat blurry picture of what exactly misconceptions are, what constitutes conceptual change, and why conceptual change is difficult. In this chapter, we suggest that one should think of misconceptions as ontological miscategorizations of concepts. From this perspective, conceptual change can be viewed as a simple shift of a concept across lateral (as opposed to hierarchical) categories. We argue that this process is difficult if students lack awareness of when a shift is necessary and/or lack an alternative category to shift into. These ideas are explored using a detailed example (i.e. diffusion) from abroad class of science concepts (i.e. emergent processes) that are often robustly misunderstood by students. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187
Conceptual Change in Childhood
Carey, S. E. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,850
Advances in Instructional Psychology
(2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315864341 · Cited by 2,532
Hempel, C. G. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,517
Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-w · Cited by 1,660
Toward an epistemology of physics
diSessa, A. A. (1993) · Cited by 1,265
Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1 · Cited by 855
Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding
Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3 · Cited by 757
Self-citationLearning science: A generative process
Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730670406 · Cited by 694
Cited by
Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust
Chi, M. T. H. (2005) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1 · Cited by 894
Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects
(2010) · INSIGHT · doi:10.1002/inst.20101338 · Cited by 816
Neuromechanical Principles Underlying Movement Modularity and Their Implications for Rehabilitation
Ting, L. H., Chiel, H. J., Trumbower, R. D., Allen, J. L., McKay, J. L., Hackney, M. E., & Kesar, T. M. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.042 · Cited by 411
Misconceived Causal Explanations for Emergent Processes
Chi, M. T. H., Roscoe, R. D., Slotta, J. D., Roy, M., & Chase, C. C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x · Cited by 305
Self-citationThe effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory.
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D.
- Venue
- Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Published
- 2006-02-24
- Pages
- 3-27
- OpenAlex
- W179363788
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 77.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_1
- The paper
- Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2006). The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change. Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.