The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism
Abstract
The power of the Marxian critique of class domination stands as an implicit suggestion that feminists should consider the advantages of adopting a historical materialist approach to understanding phallocratic domination. A specifically feminist historical materialism might enable us to lay bare the laws of tendency which constitute the structure of patriarchy over time and to follow its development in and through the Western class societies on which Marx’s interest centered. A feminist materialism might in addition enable us to expand the Marxian account to include all human activity rather than focussing on activity more characteristic of males in capitalism. The development of such a historical and materialist account is a very large task, one which requires the political and theoretical contributions of many feminists. Here I will address only the question of the epistemological underpinnings such a materialism would require. Most specifically, I will attempt to develop, on the methodological base provided by Marxian theory, an important epistemological tool for understanding and opposing all forms of domination — a feminist standpoint.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought
Collins, P. H. (1986) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/800672 · Cited by 3,536
Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting
Mullings, B. (1999) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00025-1 · Cited by 710
Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse
Freeman, M., deMarrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2007) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x06298009 · Cited by 432
A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data
Taguchi, H. L. (2012) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700112456001 · Cited by 417
25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now?
Intemann, K. (2010) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01138.x · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartsock, N. C. M.
- Venue
- Synthese Library
- Publisher
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Published
- 2005-12-29
- Pages
- 283-310
- OpenAlex
- W2162874368
- Cited by
- 1,469
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 215.09
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/0-306-48017-4_15
- The paper
- Hartsock, N. C. M. (2005). The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. Synthese Library. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48017-4_15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.