Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative Methods for Modeling Species Habitat: Comparative Performance and an Application to Australian Plants

Elith, Jane·2006·Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology
DOI 10.1007/0-387-22648-6_4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/0-387-22648-6_4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Agresti A (1996) An introduction to categorical data analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York
  2. Akçakaya HR, Atwood JL (1997) A habitat-based metapopulation model of the California Gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology 11:422–434 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aleksander I, Morton H (1990) An introduction to neural computing. Chapman and Hall, London
  4. Attiwill PM (1994) The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management 63:247–300 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Austin MP (1985) Continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:39–61 · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000351 · Paper page
  6. Austin MP, Meyers JA (1995) Modelling of landscape patterns and processes using biological data. Subproject 4: real data case study. CSIRO, Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra, Australia
  7. Austin MP, Meyers JA (1996) Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of Eucalypts: implications for management of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management 85:95–106 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Austin MP, Cunningham RB, Good RB (1983) Altitudinal distribution in relation to other environmental factors of several Eucalypt species in southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Ecology 8:169–80 · DOI
  9. Austin MP, Cunningham RB, Fleming PM (1984) New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures. Vegetatio 55:11–27 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Austin MP, Nicholls AO, Margules CR (1990) Measurement of the realised qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalypt species. Ecological Monographs 60:215–228 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Austin MP, Nicholls AO, Doherty MD, Meyers JA (1994a) Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a beta-function. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:215–228 · DOI
  12. Austin MP, Meyers JA, Doherty MD (1994b) Predictive models for landscape patterns and processes. Subproject 2: modelling of landscape patterns and processes using biological data. Division of Wildlife and Ecology, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia
  13. Bio AMF, Alkemande R, Barendregt A (1998) Determining alternative models for vegetation response analysis—a non-parametric approach. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:5–16 · DOI
  14. Booth GD, Niccolucci MJ, Schuster EG (1994) Identifying proxy sets in multiple linear regression: an aid to better coefficient interpretation. Research Paper INT-470. Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, UT
  15. Box EO, Crumpacker DW, Hardin ED (1993) A climatic model for location of plant species in Florida, USA. Journal of Biogeography 20:629–644 · DOI
  16. Brieman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA
  17. Burgman MA (1989) The habitat volumes of scarce and ubiquitous plants: a test of the model of environmental control. The American Naturalist 133:228–239 · doi:10.1086/284912
  18. Busby JR (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Nothofagus cunninghamii (Hook) Oerst in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 11:1–7 · DOI
  19. Carpenter G, Gillison AN, Winter J (1993) DOMAIN: a flexible modelling procedure for mapping potential distributions of plants and animals. Biodiversity and Conservation 2:667–680 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Coates F (1996) Ecological and biogeographical correlates of rarity in two narrow endemics in Tasmania, Spyridium microphyllum (F Muell ex Reisseck) Druce and Spyridium obcordatum (Hook) WM Curtis. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  21. Corsi F, Duprè E, Boitani L (1999) A large-scale model of wolf distribution in Italy for conservation planning. Conservation Biology 13:150–159 · DOI
  22. Crance JH (1987) Guidelines for using the Delphi technique to develop habitat suitability index curves. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 82 10134. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC
  23. Elith J, Burgman MA (in review) Predictions and their validation: rare plants in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia. In: Scott JM, Heglund P, Wall W, Samson F, Haufler J. (eds) Proceedings of “Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Scale and Accuracy” conference, Snowbird, Utah, USA
  24. Elith J, Burgman MA, Minchin P (1998) Improved protection strategies for rare plants: consultancy report for Environment Australia Project FB-NP22. Environment Australia, Canberra, Australia
  25. Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gong P, Pu R, Chen J (1996) Mapping ecological land systems and classification uncertainties from digital elevation and forest-cover data using neural networks. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62:1249–1260
  27. Gray PA, Cameron D, Kirkham I (1996) Wildlife habitat evaluation in forested ecosystems: some examples from Canada and the United States. In: DeGraaf RM, Miller RI (eds) Conservation of faunal diversity in forested landscapes. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 407–533 · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1521-3_14
  28. Guisan A (1998) Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:65–74 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characterisitc (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Harrell FE, Lee KL (1984) Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Statistics in Medicine 3:143–152 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariate prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine 15:361–387 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::aid-sim168>3.0.co;2-4
  32. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall, London
  33. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York
  34. Keith DA, Bedward M (1999) Native vegetation of the South East Forests region, Eden, New South Wales. Cunninghamia 6:1–218
  35. Jongman RH, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Wageningen, The Netherlands · DOI · Paper page
  36. Legendre L, Legendre P (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd ed. Elsevier, New York
  37. Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Tanton MT, Smith AP, Nix HA (1990a) The conservation of arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the central highlands of Victoria, south-east Australia: I. Factors influencing the occupancy of trees and hollows. Biological Conservation 54:111–131 · DOI
  38. Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Tanton MT, Smith AP, Nix HA (1990b) The habitat requirements of the Mountain Brushtail Possum and the Greater Glider in the montane ash forests of the central highlands of Victoria. Wildlife Research 17:467–478 · doi:10.1071/wr9900467
  39. Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Tanton MT, Smith AP, Nix HA (1991a) The conservation of arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the central highlands of Victoria, south-east Australia: III Models of the habitat requirements of Leadbeater’s Possum and the diversity and abundance of arboreal marsupials. Biological Conservation 56:295–315 · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(91)90063-f
  40. Lindenmayer DB, Nix HA, McMahon JP, Hutchinson MF, Tanton MT (1991b) The conservation of Leadbeater’s Possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri (McCoy): a case study of the use of bioclimatic modelling. Journal of Biogeography 18:371–383 · doi:10.2307/2845479
  41. Lynn H, Mohler CL, DeGloria SD, McCulloch CE (1995) Error assessment in decision-tree models applied to vegetation analysis. Landscape Ecology 10:323–335 · DOI
  42. Main AR (1984) Rare species, problems of conservation. Search 15:93–97
  43. Mastrorillo S, Lek S, Dauba F (1997) Predicting the abundance of minnow Phoxinus phoxinus (Cyprinidae) in the River Ariege (France) using artificial neural networks. Aquatic Living Resources 10:169–176 · doi:10.1051/alr:1997018
  44. MathSoft (1995) S-PLUS guide to statistical and mathematical analysis, version 3.3. StatSci Division, MathSoft, Inc, Seattle, WA
  45. McIntyre S, Lavorel S (1994) Predicting richness of native, rare, and exotic plants in response to habitat and disturbance variables across a variegated landscape. Conservation Biology 8:521–531 · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08020521.x
  46. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 8:283–298 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Mitchell ND (1992) The derivation of climate surfaces for New Zealand, and their application to the bioclimatic analysis of the distribution of Kauri (Agathis australis). Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 21:13–24 · DOI
  48. Nix H (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes In: Longmore R (ed) Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia, pp 4–15
  49. Pan D, Bouchard A, Legendre P, Domon G (1998) Influence of edaphic factors on the spatial structure of island halophytic communities, a case study in China. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:797–804 · doi:10.2307/3237045
  50. Prober SM, Austin MP (1990) Habitat peculiarity as a cause of rarity in Eucalyptus paliformis. Australian Journal of Ecology 16:189–205 · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1991.tb01046.x
  51. Rand GM, Newman JR (1998) The applicability of habitat evaluation methodologies in ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 4:905–929 · doi:10.1080/10807039891284875
  52. Reading RP, Clark TA, Seebeck JH, Pearce J (1996) Habitat suitability index model for the Eastern Barred Bandicoot, Perameles gunnii. Wildlife Research 23:221–235 · doi:10.1071/wr9960221
  53. Richardson DM, McMahon JP (1992) A bioclimatic analysis of Eucalyptus nitens to identify potential planting regions in southern Africa. South African Journal of Science 88:380–387
  54. Schamberger ML, O’Neil LJ (1984) Concepts and constraints of habitat-model testing. In: Verner J, Morrison ML, Ralph CJ (eds) Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. Based on an international symposium held at Stanford Sierra Camp, Fallen Leaf Lake, CA. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp 5–10
  55. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd ed. WH Freeman and Co, New York
  56. Stockwell DRB, Noble IR (1992) Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 33:385–390 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293 · DOI · Paper page
  58. ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis, a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179 · DOI · Paper page
  59. USFWS (1980) Habitat evaluation procedures. ESM 102 Release 2–80. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC
  60. Van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:893–901 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Van Horne B, Wiens JA (1991) Forest bird habitat suitability models and the development of general habitat models. Fish and Wildlife Research 8. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
  62. Wiser SK, Peet RK, White PS (1996) High-elevation rock outcrop vegetation of the southern Appalachian Mountains. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:703–722 · DOI
  63. Yee TW, Mitchell ND (1991) Generalized additive models in plant ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 2:587–602 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1992) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chemistry 39:561–577 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Elith, J.
Venue
Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published
2006-05-08
Pages
39-58
DOI
10.1007/0-387-22648-6_4
OpenAlex
W2247170044
Cited by
327
References
5
FWCI
21.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Methods for Modeling Species Habitat: Comparative Performance and an Application to Australian Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/0-387-22648-6_4
The paper
Elith, J. (2006). Quantitative Methods for Modeling Species Habitat: Comparative Performance and an Application to Australian Plants. Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22648-6_4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.