Cited by 73Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesMulti-Criteria Decision MakingUrban Planning and Valuation

Prioritizing ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing river basins: A spatial multi-criteria analytic approach

Vollmer, Derek, Pribadi, Didit Okta, Remondi, Federica, Rustiadi, Ernan, Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne·2016·Sustainable Cities and Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.004

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Indonesia, legislation and designation of Jakarta as a national strategic area with regional spatial plans exist, but lacking communication between municipalities may still lead to fragmented spatial development.

    “legislation, such as the Indonesian Water Resources Law and the designation of regions such as Jakarta Special Capital Region (Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta (DKI Jakarta)) as national strategic area with regional spatial plans, exists, but lacking communication between municipalities may still lead to a fragmented spatial development [14].”
  • Top-down approaches may not provide expected results if there is an institutional gap between the responsible authorities of a river basin.

    “Top-down approaches may not provide the expected results if there was an “institutional gap” between the responsible authorities of river basin”
  • Ecosystem services are increasingly used for decision-taking in environmental management because they promote a deeper understanding of the social-ecological system and identify positive use options rather than negative pressure avoidance as drivers for ecosystem management.

    “Ecosystem services (ES) are increasingly used for decision-taking in environmental management, as they promote a deeper understanding of the social-ecological system [182] and as they identify (positive) use options rather than (negative) pressure avoidance as drivers for ecosystem management [14].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vollmer, D., Pribadi, D. O., Remondi, F., Rustiadi, E., & Grêt-Regamey, A.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • IPB University (ID)
Corresponding author
Vollmer, Derek
Venue
Sustainable Cities and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
20
Pages
237-252
ISSN
2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1883909604
Cited by
73
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sustainable Cities and Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
Singapore-ETH Centre Future Cities Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Valuation
Keywords
ecosystem services, spatial multi-criteria evaluation, urbanization, river basins, flood risk mitigation, farmland protection, forest restoration, stakeholder preferences, scenario development, ecosystem service mapping, land use planning, biodiversity conservation, erosion control, flood damage, groundwater basins, Jakarta, watershed management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review