Cited by 359Sustainable Development and Environmental PolicyQuality of Life MeasurementMulti-Criteria Decision Making

“Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework

Munda, Giuseppe·2005·Environment, Development and Sustainability

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munda, G.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Munda, Giuseppe
Venue
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Published
2005-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
117-134
ISSN
  • 1387-585X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2975
OpenAlex
W1994748731
Cited by
358
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
31.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment Development and Sustainability (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Generalitat de Catalunya
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
sustainability measurement, sustainability assessment, multi-criteria decision making, sustainability indicators, indicator aggregation, economic growth and environmental degradation, regional economic sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review