The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Cited by
Latent dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation
Krestel, R., Fankhauser, P., & Nejdl, W. (2009) · Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems · doi:10.1145/1639714.1639726 · Cited by 494
Power Law Distributions in Information Retrieval
Petersen, C., Simonsen, J. G., & Lioma, C. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/2816815 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., & Stumme, G.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 411-426
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1549014378
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 57.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/11762256_31
- The paper
- Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., & Stumme, G. (2006). Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_31
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
