The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural Language Processing and Information Systems: 6th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NLDB 2002 Stockholm, Sweden, June 27–28, 2002 Revised Papers
Abstract
Database prototyping is a technique widely used both to validate user requirements and to verify certain application functionality. These tasks usually require the population of the underlying data structures with sampling data that, additionally, may need to stick to certain restrictions. Although some existing approaches have already automated this population task by means of random data generation, the lack of semantic meaning of the resulting structures may interfere both in the user validation and in the designer verification task. In order to solve this problem and improve the intuitiveness of the resulting prototypes, this paper presents a population system that, departing from the information contained in a UML-compliant Domain Conceptual Model, applies Information Extraction techniques to compile meaningful information sets from texts available through Internet. The system is based on the semantic information extracted from the EWN lexical resource and includes, among other features, a named entity recognition system and an ontology that speed up the prototyping process and improve the quality of the sampling data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · Cited by 38,430
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0031333 · Cited by 1,751
Cited by
Global perspectives on resilience in children and youth
Masten, A. S. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12205 · Cited by 1,710
Principles for linking fish habitat to fisheries management and conservation
Naiman, R. J., & Latterell, J. J. (2005) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00921.x · Cited by 111
Sustainability transition theories: Perpetuating or breaking with the status quo
Biely, K., & Chakori, S. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3101 · Cited by 50
A cognitive assistant for learning java featuring social dialogue
Coronado, M., Iglesias, C. A., Carrera, Á., & Mardomingo, A. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.004 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2002
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4292328707
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Language Processing and Information Systems: 6th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NLDB 2002 Stockholm, Sweden, June 27–28, 2002 Revised Papers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-36271-1
- The paper
- Natural Language Processing and Information Systems: 6th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NLDB 2002 Stockholm, Sweden, June 27–28, 2002 Revised Papers. (2002). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36271-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.