Cited by 16Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural Networks and ApplicationsCognitive Science and Education Research

Thinking about the brain

Open access
Bialek, W.·2007·Les Houches - Ecole d’Ete de Physique Theorique

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-45701-1_12

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many top-down frameworks for understanding neural computation boil down to assuming that the brain simply optimizes a single, given cost function for a single computational architecture.

    “Interestingly, many of the “top down” frameworks boil down to assuming that the brain simply optimizes a single, given cost function for a single computational architecture.”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Bialek, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bialek, W.
Affiliations
NEC (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Bialek, W.
Venue
Les Houches - Ecole d’Ete de Physique Theorique
Published
2007-08-15
Pages
485-578
OpenAlex
W1508923040
Cited by
16
References
132
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
brain computation, neural circuits, optimization principle, statistical limits, coding strategies, learning complexity, model complexity, data complexity, intelligent behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review