Cited by 77Recommender Systems and TechniquesUsability and User Interface DesignInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Pros and Cons of Controllability: An Empirical Study

Jameson, Anthony, Schwarzkopf, Eric·2002·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-47952-x_21

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While there was no performance difference, anecdotal evidence showed that some subjects strongly preferred the adaptive system, while others strongly preferred the adaptable.

    “While there was no performance difference, anecdotal evidence showed that some subjects strongly preferred the adaptive system, while others strongly preferred the adaptable.”

    From A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software (2007) · cites this paper as Jameson & Schwarzkopf, 2002

  • Jameson and Schwarzkopf compared adaptable and adaptive systems for adding items to a hotlist for a conference web site.

    “Jameson and Schwarzkopf [Jameson & Schwarzkopf, 2002] compared adaptable and adaptive systems for adding items to a hotlist for a conference web site.”

    From A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software (2007) · cites this paper as Jameson & Schwarzkopf, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jameson, A., & Schwarzkopf, E.
Affiliations
German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2002
Pages
193-202
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2149450064
Cited by
77
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
controllability, adaptive systems, user control, individual differences, adaptive system design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review