The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Event Calculus Explained
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reiter, R. (1980) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4 · Cited by 3,892
Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence
McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P. J. (1981) · Readings in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/b978-0-934613-03-3.50033-7 · Cited by 3,279
Circumscription—A form of non-monotonic reasoning
McCarthy, J. (1980) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90011-9 · Cited by 2,017
A logic-based calculus of events
Kowalski, R., & Sergot, M. (1986) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/bf03037383 · Cited by 1,690
Reiter, R. (1991) · Artificial and Mathematical Theory of Computation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-450010-5.50026-8 · Cited by 704
Gabbay, D. M., Hogger, C. J., & Robinson, J. A. (1994) · Cited by 560
Nonmonotonic logic and temporal projection
Hanks, S., & McDermott, D. (1987) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(87)90043-9 · Cited by 436
Solving the frame problem: A mathematical investigation of the common sense law of inertia
(1997) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(97)90197-8 · Cited by 404
Database Updates in the Event Calculus
Kowalski, R. (1992) · The Journal of Logic Programming · doi:10.1016/0743-1066(92)90041-z · Cited by 186
Thielscher, M. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00033-1 · Cited by 178
Cited by
PDDL2.1: An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains
Fox, M., & Long, D. (2003) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1129 · Cited by 1,741
Inductive Logic Programming as Abductive Search
Corapi, D., Russo, A., & Lupu, E. (2010) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.iclp.2010.54 · Cited by 60
Semantic Web Technology for Agent Communication Protocols
Berges, I., Bermúdez, J., Goñi, A., & Illarramendi, A. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9_4 · Cited by 7
Modeling and Verification of Real-Time Systems with the Event Calculus and s(CASP)
Varanasi, S. C., Arias, J., Salazar, E., Li, F., Basu, K., & Gupta, G. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94479-7_12 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Shanahan, M.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 409-430
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1852523103
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Event Calculus Explained. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-48317-9_17
- The paper
- Shanahan, M. (1999). The Event Calculus Explained. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48317-9_17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.