Anhedonia in Schizophrenia
Abstract
Anhedonia has long been considered a cardinal symptom of schizophrenia. This symptom is strongly associated with poor functional outcome, and limited treatment options are available. While originally conceptualized as an inability to experience pleasure, recent work has consistently shown that individuals with schizophrenia have an intact capacity to experience pleasure in-the-moment. Adjacent work in basic affective neuroscience has broadened the conceptualization of anhedonia to include not only the capacity to experience pleasure but highlights important temporal affective dynamics and decision-making processes that go awry in schizophrenia. Here we detail these mechanisms for emotional and motivational impairment in people with schizophrenia including: (1) initial response to reward; (2) reward anticipation; (3) reward learning; (4) effort-cost decision-making; (5) working memory and cognitive control. We will review studies that utilized various types of rewards (e.g., monetary, social), in order to draw conclusions regarding whether findings vary by reward type. We will then discuss how modern assessment methods may best incorporate each of the mechanisms, to provide a more fine-grained understanding of anhedonia in individuals with schizophrenia. We will close by providing a discussion of relevant future directions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ability to derive pleasure from social interaction can be selectively impaired in the absence of non-social anhedonia.
“способность получать удовольствие от общения с людьми может нарушаться избирательно при отсутствии симптомов ангедонии в несоциальных ситуациях (Moran et al., 2022).”
From Когнитивные механизмы дисфункционального принятия решений при психических расстройствах (2025) · cites this paper as Moran et al., 2022
Cites
Meta-analysis of 41 functional neuroimaging studies of executive function in schizophrenia
Minzenberg, M. J., Laird, A. R., Thelen, S., Carter, C. S., & Glahn, D. C. (2009) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.91 · Cited by 1,158 · see citing works
The clinical assessment interview for negative symptoms (CAINS): Final development and validation
Kring, A. M., Gur, R. E., Blanchard, J. J., Horan, W. P., & Reise, S. P. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010109 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Separate neural pathways process different decision costs
Rudebeck, P. H., Walton, M. E., Smyth, A. N., Bannerman, D. M., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1756 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Reward feedback alterations in unmedicated schizophrenia patients: Relevance for delusions
Schlagenhauf, F., Sterzer, P., Schmack, K., Ballmaier, M., Rapp, M., Wrase, J., Juckel, G., Gallinat, J., & Heinz, A. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.12.016 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Anhedonia and Emotional Experience in Schizophrenia: Neural and Behavioral Indicators
Dowd, E. C., & Barch, D. M. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.020 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationAbnormal Responses to Monetary Outcomes in Cortex, but not in the Basal Ganglia, in Schizophrenia
Waltz, J. A., Schweitzer, J. B., Ross, T. J., Kurup, P. K., Salmeron, B. J., Rose, E. J., Gold, J. M., & Stein, E. A. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.126 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Blanchard, J. J., Park, S. G., Catalano, L. T., & Bennett, M. E. (2015) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2015.07.019 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ipatyuk, O. V., & Kozunova, G. L. (2025) · Психология Журнал Высшей школы экономики · doi:10.17323/1813-8918-2025-4-736-752
- Authors
- Moran, E. K., Culbreth, A. J., & Barch, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barch, Deanna M.
- Venue
- Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 129-145
- ISSN
- 1866-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-3389
- OpenAlex
- W4225393319
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 31.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- anhedonia, schizophrenia, reward processing, reward anticipation, reward learning, working memory, cognitive control, motivation, social reward, monetary rewards, emotional dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Learning, Motivation, Reward, Schizophrenia, Anhedonia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review