Cited by 54Imbalanced Data Classification TechniquesMachine Learning and Data ClassificationData Stream Mining Techniques

Class Imbalance Problem

Ling, Charles X., Sheng, Victor S.·2011·Encyclopedia of Machine Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_110

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ling, C. X., & Sheng, V. S.
Venue
Encyclopedia of Machine Learning
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2011
Pages
171-171
OpenAlex
W2613869537
Cited by
54
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Encyclopedia of Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
Keywords
class imbalance, cost-sensitive learning, minority class, classification accuracy, class distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review