Cited by 19Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionMarine animal studies overview

Breeding behaviour and success in a colony of Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae at Cape Crozier, Antarctica

Oelke, Hans·1975·The Biology of Penguins

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-02270-0_16

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breeding success is highest in sub-colonies of 20-175 breeding pairs in wild Adelie penguins, but increases with colony size in wild chinstrap penguins.

    “Breeding success is highest in sub-colonies of 20–175 breeding pairs in wild Adelie penguins ( Pygoscelis adeliae ; Oelke, 1975), but increases with colony size in wild chinstrap penguins ( Pygoscelis antarctica ; Barbosa et al., 1997).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oelke, H.
Corresponding author
Oelke, Hans
Venue
The Biology of Penguins
Published
1975
Pages
363-395
OpenAlex
W2501325050
Cited by
19
References
13
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
Pygoscelis adeliae, reproductive behavior, breeding success, colony breeding, Antarctic seabirds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review