Cited by 169Avian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overviewPolar Research and Ecology

Effects of human activity on Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success

Giese, Melissa·1996·Biological Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00060-7

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adélie penguins, African penguins, and little penguins have consistently shown at various breeding sites that human disturbances such as human approach and unregulated tourism increase heart rates and avoidance of nesting near visitor footpaths and reduce breeding success.

    “For example, Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) [26,27,28,29,30]; African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) [31,32,33], and little penguins [34,35,36,37] have consistently shown, at various breeding sites, that human disturbances such as human approach and unregulated tourism (i.e., visitor numbers, noise, behaviour and interactions with penguins were uncontrolled) increase heart rates and avoid”
  • Adelie penguins have been found to have reduced breeding success as a result of repeated human approaches and nest checks.

    “For example, Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) have been found to have reduced breeding success as a result of repeated human approaches and nest checks [3].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giese, M.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Giese, Melissa
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
157-164
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156933162
Cited by
169
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Antarctic Division
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Polar Research and Ecology
Keywords
Pygoscelis adeliae, breeding success, hatching success, chick survival, human disturbance, colony size, Antarctica, seabird colonies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review