Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Linkage, recombination and mapping

Green, Earl L.·1981·Genetics and Probability in Animal Breeding Experiments

Abstract

So far we have seen that some traits of the laboratory mouse exhibit segregation in conformity with Mendel’s principle of segregation of alleles and that some sets of two traits exhibit assortment in conformity with Mendel’s principle of random assortment of non-alleles. In this chapter, we shall deal with an experiment in which the first principle holds but the second does not. Instead of random or independent assortment of non-alleles, we shall be led to infer, as many others have done since 1910, when Morgan perceived the phenomenon, that there can be non-random or dependent assortment of non-alleles. This phenomenon is called genetic linkage or, simply, linkage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-04904-2_4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Green, E. L.
Venue
Genetics and Probability in Animal Breeding Experiments
Published
1981
Pages
77-113
OpenAlex
W2468883625
Cited by
271
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linkage, recombination and mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-04904-2_4
The paper
Green, E. L. (1981). Linkage, recombination and mapping. Genetics and Probability in Animal Breeding Experiments. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04904-2_4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.