The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feminist Studies/Critical Studies
Abstract
The essays in this collection represent very recent developments in feminist research and writing in the areas of history, scientific discourse, literary criticism, and cultural theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses
Mohanty, C. (1988) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1988.42 · Cited by 4,855
The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity
Ball, S. J. (2003) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065 · Cited by 4,829
Whiteness: A strategic rhetoric
Nakayama, T. K., & Krizek, R. L. (1995) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335639509384117 · Cited by 719
Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society?
Ball, S. J. (2000) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/bf03219719 · Cited by 688
The importance of authenticity for self and society
Erickson, R. J. (1995) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.1995.18.2.121 · Cited by 633
Metadata
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 1986
- OpenAlex
- W2105862625
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.02
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminist Studies/Critical Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-18997-7
- The paper
- Feminist Studies/Critical Studies. (1986). Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18997-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
