Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Training in Organizations

Smith, Mike·1991·Analyzing Organizational Behaviour

Abstract

Selection is by no means perfect. When new recruits join an organization they are unlikely to have all the skills and competencies which are needed to do the job. Conditions also change. Even if employees once perfectly fit a job, changes will tend to erode the match between the person and their work. The way to increase or maintain skills is investment in training. Training is thus one of the most vital activities of any organization but it is important to recognize that training has its limits. No amount of training can increase someone’s intelligence. Only exorbitantly costly or unethical training is likely to produce fundamental changes in someone’s personality or thinking style. Because training is such an important business activity many agencies play an active role in its provision.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-21542-3_4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Smith, M.
Venue
Analyzing Organizational Behaviour
Published
1991
Pages
49-76
OpenAlex
W2486798226
Cited by
400
References
0
FWCI
16.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Training in Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-21542-3_4
The paper
Smith, M. (1991). Training in Organizations. Analyzing Organizational Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21542-3_4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.