The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boundaries of Science
Abstract
The working title of this Handbook presumed three neatly bounded territories: science, technology, and society. This chapter makes those territories and especially their borders into objects for sociological interpretation and seeks to recover their messiness, contentiousness, and practical significance in everyday life. Its focus is on the “boundary problem” in science and technology studies: Where does science leave off, and society — or technology — begin? Where is the border between science and non-science? Which claims or practices are scientific? Who is a scientist? What is science? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gieryn, T. F. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095325 · Cited by 4,838
Self-citationThe Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change
Kuhn, T. S. (1977) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001 · Cited by 3,861
Normal Science and its Dangers
Popper, K. R. (1970) · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171434.007 · Cited by 792
Cited by
Stirling, A. (2008) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907311265 · Cited by 1,567
The construction of global warming and the politics of science
Demeritt, D. (2001) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00245 · Cited by 729
‘Nuts and Bolts and People’ Gender Troubled Engineering Identities
Faulkner, W. (2015) · Philosophy of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_2 · Cited by 383
Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change
Zehr, S. C. (2000) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/301 · Cited by 370
Hargens, L. L. (2000) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657516 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Gieryn, T. F.
- Venue
- Science and the Quest for Reality
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 1995
- Pages
- 293-332
- OpenAlex
- W2493752877
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.77
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boundaries of Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-25249-7_12
- The paper
- Gieryn, T. F. (1995). Boundaries of Science. Science and the Quest for Reality. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25249-7_12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.