Cited by 383Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesBioethics and Human Rights Issues

‘Nuts and Bolts and People’ Gender Troubled Engineering Identities

Faulkner, Wendy·2015·Philosophy of Engineering and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_2

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faulkner, W.
Corresponding author
Faulkner, Wendy
Venue
Philosophy of Engineering and Technology
Published
2015
Pages
23-40
ISSN
  • 1879-7202 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-7210
OpenAlex
W2092702058
Cited by
383
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 29
FWCI
235.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophy of engineering and technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
Keywords
engineering identity, gender, masculinity, feminist technology studies, architects and engineers, professional tensions, women in engineering, representation of women, heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review