Cited by 106Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesNursing care and research

Demography of Informal Caregiving

Agree, Emily M., Glaser, Karen·2009·International Handbook of Population Aging

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4020-8356-3_29

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agree, E. M., & Glaser, K.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Agree, Emily M.
Venue
International Handbook of Population Aging
Published
2009
Pages
647-668
OpenAlex
W72821181
Cited by
106
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
informal care, population aging, family caregiving, older adults, fertility decline, mortality, family relationships, women's roles, instrumental support, emotional support, financial support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review