The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design of Observational Studies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, this score has a balancing property that states that if customers have the same propensity score, then the difference in their risk characteristics is independent of the assigned treatment, or 𝑇 𝑖 ⟂ 𝑿 𝑖 |𝜋(𝑡 𝑐 , 𝑿 𝑖 ) ∀𝑐 ∈ {1, … , 𝐶} (Guo & Fraser, 2009;Imbens, 2004;Rosenbaum, 2010).”
From Customer price sensitivities in competitive insurance markets (2022) · cites this paper as Rosenbaum, 2010
In the citing paper
“We recognize, of course, that quasi-experimental methods such as instrumental variables and regression discontinuity designs allow for causal conclusions to be drawn from observational snapshots when investigators make strong, explicit assumptions and articulate a credible identification strategy 27-30 .”
From Quantifying the prevalence and impact of overreaching causal claims in social science (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
The Bias Due to Incomplete Matching
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530647 · Cited by 532
Self-citationDoes Cardiac Transplantation Prolong Life?
Gail, M. H. (1972) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-76-5-815 · Cited by 124
Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2009) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8_2 · Cited by 10
Self-citationCompeting Theories Structure Design
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2009) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8_4 · Cited by 4
Self-citationTwo Simple Models for Observational Studies
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2009) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8_3 · Cited by 3
Self-citationUncommon but Dramatic Responses to Treatment
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2009) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8_16 · Cited by 2
Self-citationRosenbaum, P. R. (1995) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2443-1_7 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCausal Inference in Randomized Experiments
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2021) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003039648-ch1 · Cited by 2
Self-citationInternal and External Validity
(2020) · doi:10.4135/9781529692730 · Cited by 2
(2008) · Apress eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4302-0523-4_18 · Cited by 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,002 of 1,002
Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inference
Johansson, F. D., Shalit, U., & Sontag, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.03661 · Cited by 396
(2011) · The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenbaum, P. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rosenbaum, Paul R.
- ORCID
- Rosenbaum, Paul R.
- Venue
- Springer Series in Statistics
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2010
- ISSN
- 0172-7397 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W253646976
- Cited by
- 1,150
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer series in statistics (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Keywords
- observational studies, research design, causal inference, statistical inference, confounding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review