Cited by 27Spanish Culture and IdentitySpanish History and PoliticsMemory, violence, and history

Missing Bodies Near-at-Hand: The Dissonant Memory and Dormant Graves of the Spanish Civil War

Renshaw, Layla·2010·An Anthropology of Absence

Abstract

This contribution will look at the case of Spain’s mass graves containing the remains of tens of thousands of civilians killed by the Francoist regime during the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) and its aftermath. These graves are located in both urban and rural communities of all sizes, throughout Spain. Since 2000, these graves and the remains within them have become the focal point for intense investigative and commemorative activity, primarily structured by a campaign to exhume and formally rebury these remains. This campaign has achieved a rupture in the long-held “pact of silence”, which has hitherto surrounded the Civil War. This contribution is based on ethnographic interviews and participant observation in two small rural communities in Castile Leon, while, over three years from 2003, they experienced the extended process of exhumation, identification and reburial of bodies of Republicans buried in unmarked graves on the edge of their communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-5529-6_3

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aguilar, P. and Humlebæk, C. 2002. Collective Memory and National Identity in the Spanish Civil War, History and Memory, 14, 1-2, 121-164. · DOI
  2. Fernández de Mata, I. 2004. The “Logics” of Violence and Franco’s Mass Graves: An Ethnohistorical Approach, International Journal of the Humanities, 2(3), 2527-2535.
  3. Preston, P. 1989. Revenge and Reconciliation, History Today, 39(March), 28-33.
  4. Richards, M. 2002. From War Culture to Civil Society, History and Memory, 14(1-2), 93-120. · DOI

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Renshaw, L.
Affiliations
Kingston University London (GB)
Corresponding author
Renshaw, Layla
Venue
An Anthropology of Absence
Published
2010
Pages
45-61
OpenAlex
W165557788
Cited by
27
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
23.26
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Spanish Culture and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Spanish History and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, violence, and history
Keywords
Spanish Civil War, mass graves, Francoist repression, exhumation, reburial, pact of silence, collective memory, commemoration, rural communities, Castilla y León

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review