Cited by 427Educational Games and GamificationDigital Games and MediaGame Theory and Applications

Origins of serious games

Open access
Djaouti, Damien, Alvarez, Julian, Jessel, Jean-Pierre, Rampnoux, Olivier·2011·Serious Games and Edutainment Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_3

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J.-P., & Rampnoux, O.
Affiliations
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Université de Poitiers (FR)
Corresponding author
Djaouti, Damien
Venue
Serious Games and Edutainment Applications
Published
2011
Pages
25-43
OpenAlex
W162075811
Cited by
427
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
32.56
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Licence
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
serious games, video game history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review