Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 582

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative Study of Human and Rat Mammary Tumorigenesis

Russo, Jose, Gusterson, Barry A., Rogers, Adrianne E., Russo, Irma H., Wellings, Sefton R., Van Zwieten, Matthew J.·1990·Pathology Reviews • 1990

Abstract

We have learned through the study of human breast cancer that this disease is the result of a combination of factors, among them external factors such as ionizing radiation, diet, socioeconomic status and endocrinologic, familial or genetic factors. Among all of these factors, the development of breast cancer is influenced by the reproductive history of the individual; lower risk of breast cancer has been reported in women that have had an early full-term pregnancy (109, 110, 154, 162). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4612-0485-5_15

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 582

Metadata

Authors
Russo, J., Gusterson, B. A., Rogers, A. E., Russo, I. H., Wellings, S. R., & Van Zwieten, M. J.
Venue
Pathology Reviews • 1990
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
1990
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
217-251
OpenAlex
W127043432
Cited by
582
References
0
FWCI
12.93
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Study of Human and Rat Mammary Tumorigenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4612-0485-5_15
The paper
Russo, J., Gusterson, B. A., Rogers, A. E., Russo, I. H., Wellings, S. R., & Van Zwieten, M. J. (1990). Comparative Study of Human and Rat Mammary Tumorigenesis. Pathology Reviews • 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0485-5_15

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.