The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
Epidemiological, clinical, and experimental data indicate that the risk of developing breast cancer is strongly dependent on the ovary and on endocrine conditions modulated by ovarian function, such as early menarche, late menopause, and parity. Women who gave birth to a child when they were younger than 24 years of age exhibit a decrease in their lifetime risk of developing breast cancer, and additional pregnancies increase the protection. The breast tissue of normally cycling women contains three identifiable types of lobules, the undifferentiated Lobules type 1 (Lob 1) and the more developed Lobules type 2 and Lobules type 3. The breast attains its maximum development during pregnancy and lactation (Lobules type 4). After menopause the breast regresses in both nulliparous and parous women containing only Lob 1. Despite the similarity in the lobular composition of the breast at menopause, the fact that nulliparous women are at higher risk of developing breast cancer than parous women indicates that Lob 1 in these two groups of women might be biologically different, or might exhibit different susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Based on these observations it was postulated that Lob 1 found in the breast of nulliparous women and of parous women with breast cancer never went through the process of differentiation, retaining a high concentration of epithelial cells that are targets for carcinogens and are therefore susceptible to undergo neoplastic transformation. These epithelial cells are called Stem cells 1, whereas Lob 1 structures found in the breast of early parous postmenopausal women free of mammary pathology, on the contrary, are composed of an epithelial cell population that is refractory to transformation, called Stem cells 2. It was further postulated that the degree of differentiation acquired through early pregnancy has changed the 'genomic signature' that differentiates Lob 1 of the early parous women from that of the nulliparous women by shifting the Stem cells 1 to Stem cells 2 that are refractory to carcinogenesis, making this the postulated mechanism of protection conferred by early full-term pregnancy. The identification of a putative breast stem cell (Stem cells 1) has, in the past decade, reached a significant impulse, and several markers also reported for other tissues have been found in the mammary epithelial cells of both rodents and humans. Although further work needs to be carried out in order to better understand the role of the Stem cells 2 and their interaction with the genes that confer them a specific signature, collectively the data presently available provide evidence that pregnancy, through the process of cell differentiation, shifts Stem cells 1 to Stem cells 2 - cells that exhibit a specific genomic signature that could be responsible for the refractoriness of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greenlee, R. T., Murray, T., Bolden, S., & Wingo, P. A. (2000) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.50.1.7 · Cited by 3,850
In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells
Dontu, G., Abdallah, W. M., Foley, J. M., Jackson, K. W., Clarke, M. F., Kawamura, M. J., & Wicha, M. S. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1061803 · Cited by 2,406
Zhou, S., Schuetz, J. D., Bunting, K. D., Colapietro, A.-M., Sampath, J., Morris, J. J., Lagutina, I., Grosveld, G. C., Osawa, M., Nakauchi, H., et al. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0901-1028 · Cited by 2,280
Estrogen Receptor Null Mice: What Have We Learned and Where Will They Lead Us?
Couse, J. F., & Korach, K. S. (1999) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.20.3.0370 · Cited by 2,045
Reproductive Factors and Breast Cancer
Kelsey, J. L., Gammon, M. D., & John, E. M. (1993) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036115 · Cited by 1,446
DeOme, K. B., Faulkin, L. J., Bern, H. A., & Blair, P. B. (1959) · PubMed · Cited by 993
Age at first birth and breast cancer risk.
MacMahon, B., Cole, P. T., Lin, T. M., Lowe, C. R., Mirra, A. P., Ravnihar, B., Salber, E. J., Valaoras, V. G., & Yuasa, S. (1970) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 878
(1975) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/55.2.231 · Cited by 750
Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis
Russo, J., Tay, L. K., & Russo, I. H. (1982) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/bf01805718 · Cited by 629
Self-citationComparative Study of Human and Rat Mammary Tumorigenesis
Russo, J., Gusterson, B. A., Rogers, A. E., Russo, I. H., Wellings, S. R., & Van Zwieten, M. J. (1990) · Pathology Reviews • 1990 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0485-5_15 · Cited by 582
Self-citation
Cited by
Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.254 · Cited by 391
Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in Women
Coughlin, S. S. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_2 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Russo, J., Moral, R., Balogh, G. A., Mailo, D., & Russo, I. H.
- Venue
- Breast Cancer Research
- Published
- 2005-04-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 131-42
- ISSN
- 1465-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-542X
- OpenAlex
- W1775510084
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/bcr1029
- The paper
- Russo, J., Moral, R., Balogh, G. A., Mailo, D., & Russo, I. H. (2005). The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.