Cited by 912Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyWeed Control and Herbicide Applications

Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment for Roundup® Herbicide

Giesy, John P., Dobson, Stuart, Solomon, Keith R.·2000·Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4612-1156-3_2

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giesy, J. P., Dobson, S., & Solomon, K. R.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Venue
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Published
2000
Pages
35-120
ISSN
0179-5953 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W176172615
Cited by
912
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 39
FWCI
21.33
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Keywords
Roundup, glyphosate, environmental risk assessment, non-target organisms, weed control, herbicide formulation, environmental safety, environmental impact statement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review