Cited by 106Pesticide Exposure and ToxicityPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesAgricultural safety and regulations

Glyphosate: too much of a good thing?

Open access
Cuhra, Marek, Bøhn, Thomas, Cuhra, Petr·2016·Frontiers in Environmental Science

Abstract

Although previously accepted as the less toxic alternative, with low impact on animals, farmers as well as consumers who are exposed to residues in food, glyphosate chemicals are now increasingly controversial as new evidence from research is emerging. We argue that specific aspects of the history, chemistry and safety of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides should be thoroughly considered in present and future re-evaluations of these dominant agrochemicals: · Glyphosate is not a single chemical, it is a family of compounds with different chemical, physical and toxicological properties. · Glyphosate is increasingly recognized as having more profound toxicological effects than assumed from previous assessments. · Global use of glyphosate is continuously increasing and residues are detected in food, feed and drinking water. Thus, consumers are increasingly exposed to higher levels of glyphosate residues, and from an increasing number of sources. · Glyphosate regulation is predominantly still based on primary safety-assessment testing in various indicator organisms. However, archive studies indicate fraud and misbehavior committed by the commercial laboratories providing such research. We see emerging evidences from studies in test-animals, ecosystems indicators and studies in human health, which justify stricter regulatory measures. This implies revising glyphosate residue definitions and lowering Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) permissible in biological material intended for food and feed, as well as strengthening environmental criteria such as accepted residue concentrations in surface waters. It seems that although recent research indicates that glyphosates are less harmless than previously assumed and have complex toxicological potential, still regulatory authorities accept industry demands for approving higher levels of these residues in food and feed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00028

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glyphosate is the most commonly used herbicide.

    “Glyphosate, the most commonly used herbicide (Cuhra et al., 2016), inhibits microbial enzymes (5enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase), and some glyphosate formulations do have antibacterial properties (Tarazona et al., 2017).”

    From Gut reactions: Breaking down xenobiotic–microbiome interactions (2019) · cites this paper as Cuhra et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuhra, M., Bøhn, T., & Cuhra, P.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • GenØk (NO)
  • Czech Agriculture and Food Inspection Authority (CZ)
Corresponding author
Cuhra, Marek
Venue
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2016-04-28
Volume
4
ISSN
2296-665X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2337089673
Cited by
106
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (184107/S30 LAND)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
glyphosate, glyphosate-based herbicides, herbicide toxicity, food residues, maximum residue limits, drinking water contamination, agrochemical regulation, toxicity prediction, consumer exposure, environmental risk assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review