Cited by 1,374Statistical Methods and InferenceAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsProbability and Statistical Research

Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife

Efron, Bradley·1992·Springer Series in Statistics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_41

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Efron, B.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Efron, Bradley
Venue
Springer Series in Statistics
Published
1992
Pages
569-593
ISSN
0172-7397 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4244777963
Cited by
1,374
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 148 · 2025: 171 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.85
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer series in statistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
bootstrapping, jackknife, linearization, linear discriminant analysis, ratio estimation, regression coefficient estimation, nonparametric estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review