Cited by 36Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

ExplainaBoard: An Explainable Leaderboard for NLP

Open access
Liu, Pengfei, Fu, Jinlan, Xiao, Yang, Yuan, Weizhe, Chang, Shuaichen, Dai, Junqi, Liu, Yixin, Ye, Zihuiwen +1 more·2021·Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations

Abstract

Pengfei Liu, Jinlan Fu, Yang Xiao, Weizhe Yuan, Shuaichen Chang, Junqi Dai, Yixin Liu, Zihuiwen Ye, Graham Neubig. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. 2021.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-demo.34

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A more granular assessment can be particularly valuable because it allows users to pinpoint where inaccuracies occur and serves as a reward model for developers to refine their generative systems.

    “A more granular assessment can be particularly valuable because it (1) not only allows users to pinpoint where inaccuracies occur (Liu et al., 2021) but also (2) serves as a reward model for developers to refine their generative systems (Lightman et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. PMLR.
  2. Yixin Liu, Dou Ziyi, and Pengfei Liu. 2021. Ref- sum: Refactoring neural summarization. In The 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Hu- man Language Technologies.
  3. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher D. Man- ning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of- speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Human Language Tech- nology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 252-259.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, P., Fu, J., Xiao, Y., Yuan, W., Chang, S., Dai, J., Liu, Y., Ye, Z., & Neubig, G.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Neubig, Graham
Venue
Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations
Published
2021
Pages
280-289
OpenAlex
W3173322864
Cited by
35
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (ACL Demo) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Air Force Research Laboratory (FA8750-19-2-0200)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
explainable AI, natural language processing, model evaluation, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review