Cited by 240Protein Structure and DynamicsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence AnalysisHeat shock proteins research

Fuzzy Complexes: A More Stochastic View of Protein Function

Fuxreiter, Monika, Tompa, Peter·2012·Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are widespread in eukaryotic proteomes and challenge the classical structure-function paradigm that equates a folded 3-D structure with protein function. However, IDPs often function by molecular recognition, in which they bind a partner molecule and undergo "induced folding" or "disorder-to-order transition" upon binding, which apparently suggests that in a functional context IDPs become ordered. Whereas this observation would restore the "prestige" of the classical structure-function paradigm, a closer inspection of the complexes of IDPs reveals that they do not always become fully ordered, but preserve functionally significant disorder in the complex with their binding partner(s). This phenomenon, which we termed "fuzziness", is the ultimate extension of structural disorder to the functional native state of proteins. In this introductory chapter, we outline the most important aspects of fuzziness, such as its structural categories, molecular mechanisms of function it mediates and the biological processes, in which it plays a distinguished role. As confirmed by all the other chapters of the book, we will show that new cases of fuzziness pop up at an accelerating pace, underscoring that this phenomenon presents a widespread novel paradigm of protein structure and function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-0659-4_1

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuxreiter, M., & Tompa, P.
Venue
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2012
Volume
725
Pages
1-14
ISSN
0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2243182195
Cited by
240
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 5
FWCI
35.58
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, fuzziness, protein complexes, induced folding, disorder-to-order transition, protein function, structure-function relationship, molecular recognition, protein-protein interaction
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review