Cited by 479Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLiteracy and Educational PracticesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Instructional Contexts for Engagement and Achievement in Reading

Guthrie, John T., Wigfield, Allan, You, Wei·2012·Handbook of Research on Student Engagement

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_29

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research in mainstream classrooms has found different sets of indicators of cognitive engagement for different curriculum areas, including mathematics and reading.

    “Research conducted in mainstream classrooms has already found different sets of indicators of cognitive engagement for different curriculum areas including mathematics (Helme & Clarke, 2001) and reading (Guthrie, Wigfield, & You, 2012).”

    From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Guthrie, Wigfield, & You, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Guthrie, John T.
Venue
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2012
Pages
601-634
OpenAlex
W200837512
Cited by
479
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
40.98
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
reading engagement, reading motivation, behavioral engagement, reading achievement, Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction, reading comprehension instruction, reading strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review