The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applied Predictive Modeling
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“[L1.1] No test set. Using the same dataset for training and testing the model is a textbook example of overfitting, which leads to overoptimistic performance estimates.54”
From Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“Following recommendations by Kuhn and Johnson,31 we used 5-fold cross-validation with 3 repetitions to select the optimal λ (shrinkage) and α (mixing) parameters for each elastic net model. This also allowed us to obtain a cross-validation estimate of model performance.”
From A pilot study using frequent inpatient assessments of suicidal thinking to predict short-term postdischarge suicidal behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Random forests can naturally be adapted to fit the unbalanced data framework by down-sampling the majority class and growing each tree on a more balanced data set (Chen et al., 2004; Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Kuhn and Johnson, 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,024
Schultebraucks, K., Qian, M., Amara, D. A., Dean, K. R., LASKA, E. M., Siegel, C., Gautam, A., Guffanti, G., Hammamieh, R., Misganaw, B., et al. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0789-2 · Cited by 110
Modeling the Kinematics of Human Locomotion Over Continuously Varying Speeds and Inclines
Embry, K., Villarreal, D. J., Macaluso, R., & Gregg, R. D. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2018.2879570 · Cited by 111
Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment
Rachman, A., & Ratnayake, R. M. C. (2019) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.008 · Cited by 112
Real‐time biomechanics using the finite element method and machine learning: Review and perspective
Phellan, R., Hachem, B., Clin, J., Mac‐Thiong, J., & Duong, L. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.14602 · Cited by 120
Schrader, L., Vargas Toro, A., Konietzny, S., Rüping, S., Schäpers, B., Steinböck, M., Krewer, C., Müller, F., Güttler, J., & Bock, T. (2020) · Journal of Population Ageing · doi:10.1007/s12062-020-09260-z · Cited by 110
“The performance of a model on a test dataset is an indicator of how well a model might perform in the future on previously not seen data (Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
BackgroundWhich log level should developers choose for a new logging statement?
Li, H., Shang, W., & Hassan, A. E. (2016) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-016-9456-2 · Cited by 118
“In particular, the AUC provides a good performance measure when the distribution of the predicted categories is imbalanced (Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJeong, G., Oeverdieck, H., Park, S. J., Huwe, B., & Ließ, M. (2017) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2017.02.006 · Cited by 109
Tuyen, T. T., Jaafari, A., Yen, H. P. H., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Phong, T. V., Nguyen, H. D., Le, H. V., Phương, T. T. M., Nguyen, S. H., Prakash, I., et al. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101292 · Cited by 107
A novel, data-driven heuristic framework for vessel weather routing
Gkerekos, C., & Lazakis, I. (2020) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106887 · Cited by 107
“Whereas parameters are elements of the model that are directly learnt from the training data, hyperparameters cannot180 be directly estimated from the training data as there is no analytical formula available to calculate an appropriate value (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
BackgroundJonge, N. D., Mildau, K., Meijer, D., Louwen, J. J. R., Bueschl, C., Huber, F., & van der Hooft, J. J. J. (2022) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-022-01963-y · Cited by 131
“Here, the bootstrap sample performance variability gives an estimate of the variability of performance using only a single test set (Hastie et al., 2009; Kuhn & Johnson, 2013).”
MethodGrinn‐Gofroń, A., Nowosad, J., Bosiacka, B., et al. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.419 · Cited by 105
“The accuracy of all models was assessed using a repeated k-fold cross-validation 247 (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
MethodMachine learning for prediction of septic shock at initial triage in emergency department
Kim, J., Chang, H., Kim, D., Jang, D., Park, I., & Kim, K. (2019) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.024 · Cited by 105
Integrated Multiple Directed Attention-Based Deep Learning for Improved Air Pollution Forecasting
Dairi, A., Harrou, F., Khadraoui, S., & Sun, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3091511 · Cited by 104
Naghib, A., Gharehchopogh, F. S., & Zamanifar, A. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-11101-w · Cited by 135
Gupta, J. K., Adams, D. J., & Berry, N. G. (2016) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c6sc00722h · Cited by 108
What Can We Learn from Predictive Modeling?
Cranmer, S., & Desmarais, B. A. (2017) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2017.3 · Cited by 102
“…prediction, is a useful way to tune the parsimony of a model because predictive exercises allow one to judge how much impact is being made by each element of the model in terms of its contribution to predictive performance (Hastie, Tibshirani, and Friedman 2009; Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
BackgroundNateghi, R. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2792680 · Cited by 104
Czernecki, B., Taszarek, M., Marosz, M., Półrolniczak, M., Kolendowicz, L., Wyszogrodzki, A. A., & Szturc, J. (2019) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.05.010 · Cited by 105
António, N., de Almeida, A., & Nunes, L. (2019) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1938965519851466 · Cited by 108
“Feature selection, particularly feature engineering, can contribute positively to the accuracy of prediction models due to the information gain obtained from the association of multiple input variables (Abbott, 2014; Kuhn & Johnson, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKarhade, A. V., Ogink, P. T., Thio, Q. C. B. S., Cha, T. D., Gormley, W. B., Hershman, S. H., Smith, T. R., Mao, J., Schoenfeld, A. J., Bono, C. M., et al. (2019) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.002 · Cited by 105
Machine learning to predict cardiovascular risk
Quesada, J. A., López‐Pineda, A., Gil-Guillén, V. F., Durazo-Arvizú, R., Orozco‐Beltrán, D., López-Domenech, A., & Carratalá‐Munuera, C. (2019) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/ijcp.13389 · Cited by 103
Predicting Forage Quality of Grasslands Using UAV-Borne Imaging Spectroscopy
Wijesingha, J., Astor, T., Schulze‐Brüninghoff, D., Wengert, M., & Wachendorf, M. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12010126 · Cited by 104
Ahmad, H. F., Mukhtar, H., Alaqail, H., Seliaman, M. E., & Alhumam, A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11031173 · Cited by 108
“The objective is to remove the features that may be non-informative or redundant predictors in the model [56].”
BackgroundMachine learning based prediction model for thermal conductivity of concrete
Sargam, Y., Wang, K., & Cho, I. H. (2020) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101956 · Cited by 103
Abbasi, E. (2025) · Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102841 · Cited by 106
Wang, S. B., Coppersmith, D. D. L., Kleiman, E. M., Bentley, K. H., Millner, A. J., Fortgang, R., Mair, P., Dempsey, W., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0591 · Cited by 98
The State‐of‐the‐Art in Predictive Visual Analytics
Lu, Y., Garcia, R., Hansen, B., et al. (2017) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.13210 · Cited by 98
“Arguably, the main tasks in predictive analytics are relevant to numerical predictions (where the most common predictive analytics methods are regressions), and categorical predictions (where the most common methods focus on classification and clustering) [KJ13].”
BackgroundBéguin, J., Fuglstad, G., Mansuy, N., & Paré, D. (2017) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.06.016 · Cited by 105
“For machine-learning approaches, we selected four supervised 257 methods that are used extensively in predictive modeling (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodWalsh, C. G., Sharman, K., & Hripcsak, G. M. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.008 · Cited by 102
Karhade, A. V., Ogink, P. T., Thio, Q. C. B. S., Broekman, M. L. D., Cha, T., Gormley, W. B., Hershman, S. H., Peul, W. C., Bono, C. M., & Schwab, J. H. (2018) · Neurosurgical FOCUS · doi:10.3171/2018.8.focus18340 · Cited by 105
“8,13,16 The best-performing model was used to predict discharge disposition in the testing set.”
MethodMachine Learning Approaches for Auto Insurance Big Data
Hanafy, M., & Ming, R. (2021) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks9020042 · Cited by 102
2D Pose-Based Real-Time Human Action Recognition With Occlusion-Handling
Angelini, F., Fu, Z., Long, Y., Shao, L., & Naqvi, S. M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2019.2944745 · Cited by 99
“We adopted the cross-validation setting used in many different works [46]–[53].”
MethodBhamare, D. K., Saikia, P., Rathod, M. K., Rakshit, D., & Banerjee, J. (2021) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107927 · Cited by 103
Meta-matching as a simple framework to translate phenotypic predictive models from big to small data
He, T., An, L., Chen, P., Chen, J., Feng, J., Bzdok, D., Holmes, A. J., Eickhoff, S. B., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01059-9 · Cited by 101
Fault detection based on time series modeling and multivariate statistical process control
Sanchez‐Fernandez, A. J., Baldán, F. J., Sainz-Palmero, G. I., Benítez, J. M., & Fuente, M. J. (2018) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.08.003 · Cited by 102
“Neural networks are a useful non-linear modelling technique [23], especially the Multilayer Perceptions (MLP) neural networks, which are capable of approximating, to arbitrary accuracy, any continuous function as long as they contain enough hidden units [24].”
MethodAutomatic Features Extraction Using Autoencoder in Intrusion Detection System
Kunang, Y. N., Nurmaini, S., Stiawan, D., Zarkasi, A., Firdaus, F., & Jasmir, J. (2018) · doi:10.1109/icecos.2018.8605181 · Cited by 103
Band, S. S., Janizadeh, S., Pal, S. C., et al. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20205763 · Cited by 100
A Truly Spatial Random Forests Algorithm for Geoscience Data Analysis and Modelling
Talebi, H., Peeters, L. J. M., Otto, A., & Tolosana‐Delgado, R. (2021) · Mathematical Geosciences · doi:10.1007/s11004-021-09946-w · Cited by 100
Haddad, H., Alharasis, E., FraiJ, J., & Al-Ramahi, N. (2024) · Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics · doi:10.37394/23207.2024.21.93 · Cited by 10
Efficiency drivers in Brazilian insurance: A two-stage DEA meta frontier-data mining approach
Wänke, P., & Barros, C. P. (2015) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.005 · Cited by 100
“referred to as tuning parameters because there is no analytical formula available to calculate an appropriate value for them (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGasch, C. K., Tomislav Hengl, A., Gräler, B., Meyer, H., Magney, T. S., & Brown, D. J. (2015) · Spatial Statistics · doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2015.04.001 · Cited by 99
Webb, C. A., Cohen, Z. D., Beard, C., Forgeard, M. J. C., Peckham, A., & Björgvinsson, Þ. (2019) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000451 · Cited by 96
“In an effort to minimize overfitting and identify a model that would best generalize to a holdout sample, we ran each of the 14 algorithms within 10-folds cross-validation, such that the training dataset (n = 387) was split into ten equal size samples (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013).”
MethodElhai, J. D., Yang, H., Rozgonjuk, D., & Montag, C. (2019) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106261 · Cited by 114
Application of Artificial Intelligence-based predictive methods in Ionic liquid studies: A review
Falola, Y., Olayiwola, T., & Afagwu, C. C. (2020) · Fluid Phase Equilibria · doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2020.112898 · Cited by 99
Random Forest Algorithm for the Strength Prediction of Geopolymer Stabilized Clayey Soil
Zeini, H. A., Al-Jeznawi, D., Imran, H., Bernardo, L. F. A., Al-Khafaji, Z. S., & Ostrowski, K. A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15021408 · Cited by 111
Rice, J. S., Emanuel, R. E., Vose, J. M., & Nelson, S. A. C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016367 · Cited by 95
“Model tuning was automated via repeated k-fold cross-validation [Hastie et al., 2009; James et al., 2013; Kuhn and Johnson, 2013] with 10 repeats and 10 folds to optimize model performance via the minimization of RMSE, with implementation conducted in R using the caret package [Kuhn, 2008; Kuhn and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWound image evaluation with machine learning
Veredas, F. J., Luque‐Baena, R. M., Martín‐Santos, F. J., Herrera, J. C. M., & Morente, L. (2015) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.091 · Cited by 96
“, SVM, RF and NN), this complete RFE scheme described must be accomplished on each one of these proposed models [37], which becomes computationally burdensome.”
MethodMeyer, H., Kühnlein, M., Appelhans, T., et al. (2015) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.09.021 · Cited by 98
Machine learning in laboratory medicine: waiting for the flood?
Cabitza, F., & Banfi, G. (2017) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2017-0287 · Cited by 108
“Although many physicians would concur with Kuhn and Johnson [14] that “as long as the model can be appropriately validated, it should not matter whether it is a black box or a simple, interpretable model”, others could make a strong argument that this would be unethical in medicine.”
BackgroundSchlögl, M., Stütz, R., Laaha, G., & Melcher, M. (2019) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.008 · Cited by 97
Knoll, L., Breuer, L., & Bach, M. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab7d5c · Cited by 98
“In order to ensure an approximately equal distribution of the response variable in both data sets, stratified random sampling is applied (Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
MethodPark, H., Nguyen, D. S., Le-Hong, T., & Tran, X. V. (2021) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-021-01773-4 · Cited by 102
McDonald, A. D., Ferris, T. K., & Wiener, T. A. (2019) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819856454 · Cited by 99
Machine learning application to predict yields of solid products from biomass torrefaction
Onsree, T., & Tippayawong, N. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.099 · Cited by 98
Zhou, J. P., Shi, X., & Li, X. (2015) · Journal of Vibration and Control · doi:10.1177/1077546314568172 · Cited by 96
“There are three main parameters (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013): M is the total number of boosting iterations (n.trees), v is the learning rate (shrinkage coefficient) and J is the number of terminal nodes (tree size).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPutka, D. J., Beatty, A. S., & Reeder, M. C. (2017) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117697041 · Cited by 107
“Both Hastie et al. (2009) and Kuhn and Johnson (2013) provide more specific guidance to researchers on which prediction methods are best suited to a given situation based on characteristics of one’s modeling situation.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialApplication of machine learning to predict obstructive sleep apnea syndrome severity
Mencar, C., Gallo, C., Mantero, M., Tarsia, P., Carpagnano, G. E., Barbaro, M. P. F., & Lacedonia, D. (2019) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458218824725 · Cited by 102
Page, G. P., Kanias, T., Guo, Y., Lanteri, M. C., Zhang, X., Mast, A. E., Cable, R. G., Spencer, B. R., Kiss, J. E., Fang, F., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci146077 · Cited by 103
Ließ, M., Schmidt, J., & Glaser, B. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153673 · Cited by 96
“Accordingly, most filter methods evaluate each predictor individually and ignore possibly important predictor interactions, whereas wrapper methods result in an increase in computation time [23].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialNguyen, X. C., Ly, Q. V., Nguyen, T. T. H., Ngo, H. T. T., Hu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132203 · Cited by 95
Multi-objective optimization of shield construction parameters based on random forests and NSGA-II
Wu, X., Wang, L., Chen, B., et al. (2022) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2022.101751 · Cited by 95
Predicting efficiency in Islamic banks: An integrated multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach
Wänke, P., Azad, M. A. K., Barros, C. P., et al. (2016) · Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money · doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2016.07.004 · Cited by 95
Predicting efficiency in Malaysian Islamic banks: A two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks approach
Wänke, P., Azad, M. A. K., & Barros, C. P. (2015) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.10.002 · Cited by 94
Studying software logging using topic models
Li, H., Chen, T.-H. P., Shang, W., & Hassan, A. E. (2018) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-018-9595-8 · Cited by 91
“An over-fitted model performs very well on the data on which the model was built, but usually has poor accuracy on a new data sample (Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialFrom statistical‐ to machine learning‐based network traffic prediction
Lohrasbinasab, I., Shahraki, A., Taherkordi, A., & Jurcut, A. D. (2021) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.4394 · Cited by 113
A Feature Extraction & Selection Benchmark for Structural Health Monitoring
Buckley, T., Ghosh, B., & Pakrashi, V. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217221111141 · Cited by 95
“The advantage of bagging is that the by averaging multiple noisy unbiased models, the variance is significantly reduced.(66) For the Bagged Tree, the entire feature set is considered when splitting every node in every decision tree, therefore the trees are not completely independent of each other.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe effect of feature normalization methods in radiomics
Demircioğlu, A. (2024) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-023-01575-7 · Cited by 96
“While other normalization methods, such as quantile and power transformation, exist [13], they were not widely utilized in radiomics [10].”
Irving, J., Patel, R., Oliver, D., Colling, C., Pritchard, M., Broadbent, M., Baldwin, H., Stahl, D., Stewart, R., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2021) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa126 · Cited by 92
on behalf of the IPF-PRO Registry investigators, Todd, J. L., Neely, M. L., Overton, R. A., Durham, K., Gulati, M., Huang, H. J., Roman, J., Newby, L. K., Flaherty, K. R., et al. (2019) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-019-1190-z · Cited by 93
3D NLTE spectral line formation of lithium in late-type stars.
Wang, E., Nordlander, T., Asplund, M., Amarsi, A., Lind, K., & Zhou, Y.-X. (2020) · Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3381 · Cited by 42
Aghaabbasi, M., Ali, M., Jasiński, M., Leonowicz, Z. M., & Novák, T. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3247448 · Cited by 107
“…into two categories: model parameters, which may be initiated and adjusted via data learning; and hyperparameters, which cannot be easily approximated from data learning and should be established prior to training an ML model since they determine the model architecture [32], [33], [34], [35].”
BackgroundBori, L., Payá, E., Alegre, L., et al. (2020) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.023 · Cited by 92
The current and future uses of machine learning in ecosystem service research
Scowen, M., Athanasiadis, I. N., Bullock, J. M., Eigenbrod, F., & Willcock, S. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149263 · Cited by 104
“…need to test for generalisability when, for example, using a CART to estimate variable importance, as compared to the need to a predictive classi fi cation model, because an estimation of variable importance does not explicitly generalise beyond the learnt parameter space (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
MethodEstimation of Wheat Plant Density at Early Stages Using High Resolution Imagery
Liu, S., Baret, F., Andrieu, B., Burger, P., & Hemmerlé, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00739 · Cited by 95
“A compact, parsimonious and non-redundant subset of features should contribute to speed up the learning process and improve the generalization of predictive models (Tuv et al., 2009; Kuhn and Johnson, 2013; Louppe, 2014).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the effects of different review features on purchase probability
Kim, S. J., Masłowska, E., & Malthouse, E. C. (2017) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1340928 · Cited by 98
“To make sure that we are not overfitting, we use five-fold cross validation by assigning a random value 1–5 to each case (Kuhn and Johnson 2013, 69–70).”
MethodPredicting Violent Behavior: What Can Neuroscience Add?
Poldrack, R. A., Monahan, J. T., Imrey, P. B., Reyna, V. F., Raichle, M. E., Faigman, D. L., & Buckholtz, J. W. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.003 · Cited by 97
Baquero, O. S., Santana, L. M. R., & Neto, F. C. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195065 · Cited by 94
García, F. C., Alonso‐Sarría, F., Gomariz‐Castillo, F., & Oñate-Valdivieso, F. (2017) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2017.02.012 · Cited by 91
Machine Learning for Predicting Patient Wait Times and Appointment Delays
Curtis, C., Liu, C., Bollerman, T. J., & Pianykh, O. S. (2017) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.021 · Cited by 90
“Since then, driven by scientific research and growth in computing power, ML evolved rapidly, enriching itself with a wealth of diverse computational approaches [7,8,10,11].”
BackgroundNixon, N., Nixon, T. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1102-z · Cited by 134
Preventing rather than punishing: An early warning model of malfeasance in public procurement
Gallego, J., Rivero, G., & Martínez, J. D. S. (2020) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.006 · Cited by 123
“Such imbalance sometimes, but not always, causes issues with classification tasks (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013) using metrics like accuracy, because models can attain high performance by predicting all instances as belonging to the majority class.”
BackgroundKühl, N., Mühlthaler, M., & Goutier, M. (2019) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00351-0 · Cited by 103
On the utilization of deep and ensemble learning to detect milk adulteration
Neto, H. A., Tavares, W. L. F., Ribeiro, D. C., Alves, R. C. D. O., Fonseca, L. M., & Campos, S. (2019) · BioData Mining · doi:10.1186/s13040-019-0200-5 · Cited by 93
On the use of machine learning algorithms in forensic anthropology
Nikita, E., & Nikitas, P. (2020) · Legal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101771 · Cited by 100
Drivers of Fire Anomalies in the Brazilian Amazon: Lessons Learned from the 2019 Fire Crisis
Silveira, M. V. F., Petri, C. A., Broggio, I. S., Chagas, G. O., Macul, M. D. S., Leite, C., Ferrari, E. M. M., Amim, C. G. V., de Freitas, A. L. R., Motta, A. Z., et al. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9120516 · Cited by 97
“The other two landscape metrics presented high AUC values only in AM and AP.”
MethodInfluentialChamseddine, E., Mansouri, N., Soui, M., & Abed, M. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109588 · Cited by 112
“In predictive modeling, imbalanced classifications are a challenging problem because most ML classification algorithms were developed with the assumption that all the classes have the same number of samples [76].”
BackgroundMachine Learning Models for Data-Driven Prediction of Diabetes by Lifestyle Type
Qin, Y., Wu, J., Wen, X., Wang, K., Huang, A., Liu, B., Yu, J., Li, C., Yu, F., & Ren, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192215027 · Cited by 108
“That is, the number of samples in one category is much larger than in the other [26,27].”
BackgroundAssessing and improving the transferability of current global spatial prediction models
Ludwig, M., Moreno‐Martinez, A., Hölzel, N., Pebesma, E., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.13635 · Cited by 92
Applying Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning to Slope Stability Prediction
Pei, T., Qiu, T., & Shen, C. (2023) · Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/jggefk.gteng-11053 · Cited by 97
The importance of prediction model validation and assessment in obesity and nutrition research
Ivanescu, A. E., Li, P., George, B. J., Brown, A. W., Keith, S. W., Raju, D. A., & Allison, D. B. (2015) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2015.214 · Cited by 97
Harris, T. D., Smith, V. H., Graham, J. L., et al. (2016) · Inland Waters · doi:10.5268/iw-6.2.938 · Cited by 90
“Multivariate relations between water quality parameters (TN, TP, TN:TP, NO3, NH3, NO3:NH3), cyanobacteria, and cyanobacterial secondary metabolites were determined using principal components analysis (PCA) as described by Kuhn and Johnson (2013).”
MethodRen, K., Fang, W., Qu, J., Zhang, X., & Shi, X. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124897 · Cited by 89
Improving healthcare operations management with machine learning
Pianykh, O. S., Guitron, S., Parke, D., Zhang, C., Pandharipande, P., Brink, J., & Rosenthal, D. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0176-3 · Cited by 87
Selvaraj, M. G., Valderrama, M., Guzman, D., Valencia-Ortiz, M., Ruiz, H., & Acharjee, A. (2020) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-020-00625-1 · Cited by 92
Machine learning models for streamflow regionalization in a tropical watershed
Ferreira, R. G., da Silva, D. D., Elesbon, A. A. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111713 · Cited by 89
Niri, M. F., Reynolds, C. D., Román‐Ramírez, L. A., Kendrick, E., & Marco, J. (2022) · Energy storage materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2022.06.036 · Cited by 93
“For this purpose, the cross validation (CV) approach is utilised [60].”
MethodImmitzer, M., Stepper, C., Böck, S., Straub, C., & Atzberger, C. (2015) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.018 · Cited by 90
Kern, A. N., Addison, P. E., Oommen, T., et al. (2017) · Mathematical Geosciences · doi:10.1007/s11004-017-9681-2 · Cited by 88
“Instead of defining the distribution for each predictor individually, the distributions are combined by class (Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBobrowski, M., & Schickhoff, U. (2017) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.021 · Cited by 93
Enhanced estimations of post‐stroke aphasia severity using stacked multimodal predictions
Pustina, D., Coslett, H. B., Ungar, L., Faseyitan, O. K., Medaglia, J. D., Avants, B., & Schwartz, M. F. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23752 · Cited by 86
“RF can (1) detect linear and nonlinear relationships, (2) detect variable interactions, and (3) utilize a large number of variables with minimal overfitting [Kuhn and Johnson, 2013].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W429766147
- Cited by
- 6,788
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 564 · 2025: 813 · 2024: 727 · 2023: 776 · 2022: 810 · 2021: 815 · 2020: 715 · 2019: 492 · 2018: 382 · 2017: 271 · 2016: 198 · 2015: 156 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 32.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Keywords
- predictive modeling, data preprocessing, data partitioning, model calibration, model selection, model evaluation, classification, regression analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review