The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applied Predictive Modeling
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“[L1.1] No test set. Using the same dataset for training and testing the model is a textbook example of overfitting, which leads to overoptimistic performance estimates.54”
From Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“Following recommendations by Kuhn and Johnson,31 we used 5-fold cross-validation with 3 repetitions to select the optimal λ (shrinkage) and α (mixing) parameters for each elastic net model. This also allowed us to obtain a cross-validation estimate of model performance.”
From A pilot study using frequent inpatient assessments of suicidal thinking to predict short-term postdischarge suicidal behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Random forests can naturally be adapted to fit the unbalanced data framework by down-sampling the majority class and growing each tree on a more balanced data set (Chen et al., 2004; Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Kuhn and Johnson, 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,024
Topic modelling for theme park online reviews: analysis of Disneyland
Luo, J. M., Vu, H. Q., Li, G., & Law, R. (2020) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2020.1740138 · Cited by 88
“We adopt the 10-fold cross-validation approach (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013), in which an entire review data set is partitioned into 10.”
MethodSarkar, M., & Bruyn, A. D. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.07.002 · Cited by 107
“Settings that are used to control the learning of the algorithm, but are not parameters tuned by the learning algorithm itself, are referred to as hyperparameters (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013).”
Taiwo, O. R., Onyeaka, H. N., Oladipo, E. K., Oloke, J. K., & Chukwugozie, D. C. (2024) · International Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1155/2024/6612162 · Cited by 96
“Boosting algorithms function by aggregating (boosting) several weak classifers (a weak classifer predicts marginally better than random) into an ensemble with improved accuracy [173].”
Taking the Blame Game out of Data Centers Operations with NetPoirot
Arzani, B., Ciraci, S., Loo, B. T., et al. (2016) · ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM) · doi:10.1145/2934872.2934884 · Cited by 88
“0 [16].”
Combining machine learning algorithms and geometric morphometrics: A study of carnivore tooth marks
Courtenay, L. A., Yravedra, J., Huguet, R., Aramendi, J., Maté‐González, M. Á., González‐Aguilera, D., & Arriaza, M. C. (2019) · Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.03.007 · Cited by 87
“This is done by creating a per-class mixture (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013), consisting in the separation of class-specific means from class-specific covariance structures.”
MethodReichel, D. (2017) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260517698951 · Cited by 87
“This estimate does not replace and is not comparable with proper methods for predicting the outcome variable as used in statistical learning methods employing training and test datasets and different algorithms for prediction (e.g., Kuhn & Johnson, 2013).”
MethodPrediction of Early TBI Mortality Using a Machine Learning Approach in a LMIC Population
de Amorim, R. L. O., Oliveira, L. M., Malbouisson, L. M. S., Nagumo, M. M., Simoes, M., Miranda, L. C., Bor‐Seng‐Shu, E., Beer‐Furlan, A., de Andrade, A. F., Rubiano, A. M., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.01366 · Cited by 87
“Data Analysis We initially performed a graphical exploratory analysis evaluating the frequency, percentage, and near-zero variance for all categorical variables, distribution for numeric variables, and missing values and patterns of all variables (17).”
MethodMapping the geogenic radon potential for Germany by machine learning
Petermann, E., Meyer, H., Nussbaum, M., & Bossew, P. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142291 · Cited by 80
Valverde, S. C., Solas, P. J. C., & Fernández, F. R. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240362 · Cited by 104
(Generalized Linear) Mixed‐Effects Modeling: A Learner Corpus Example
Gries, S. Τ. (2021) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12448 · Cited by 94
Forecasting sales using online review and search engine data: A method based on PCA–DSFOA–BPNN
Zhang, C., Tian, Y., & Fan, Z. (2021) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.07.010 · Cited by 90
Sorrentino, C., D’Antonio, L., Fieni, C., Ciummo, S. L., & Carlo, E. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.778329 · Cited by 92
A proficient approach to forecast COVID-19 spread via optimized dynamic machine learning models
Alali, Y., Harrou, F., & Sun, Y. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06218-3 · Cited by 87
Latifi, H., Fassnacht, F. E., Müller, J. C., Tharani, A., Dech, S. W., & Heurich, M. (2015) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.06.008 · Cited by 87
Deep-learning-based risk stratification for mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction
Kwon, J.-M., Jeon, K.-H., Kim, H. M., Kim, M. J., Lim, S., Kim, K.-H., Song, P. S., Park, J., Choi, R. K., & Oh, B.-H. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224502 · Cited by 86
Predicting the structural condition of individual sanitary sewer pipes with random forests
Harvey, R. R., & McBean, E. A. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1139/cjce-2013-0431 · Cited by 89
“The resulting class prediction for new instances is obtained by having each tree cast a class vote (the mode of all the votes is the resulting prediction of the random forest) (Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialPrediction of open stope hangingwall stability using random forests
Qi, C., Fourie, A. B., Du, X., & Tang, X. (2018) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-018-3246-7 · Cited by 89
Deep learning model for simulating influence of natural organic matter in nanofiltration
Shim, J., Park, S., & Cho, K. H. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117070 · Cited by 87
Montolío, A., Martín-Gallego, A., Cegoñino, J., Orduna, E., Viladés, E., García‐Martín, E., & del Palomar, A. P. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104416 · Cited by 91
High-resolution agriculture soil property maps from digital soil mapping methods, Czech Republic
Žížala, D., Minařík, R., Skála, J., Beitlerová, H., Juřicová, A., Rojas, J. R., Penížek, V., & Zádorová, T. (2022) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2022.106024 · Cited by 88
Forecast of the higher heating value in biomass torrefaction by means of machine learning techniques
Nieto, P. J. G., García–Gonzalo, E., Lasheras, F. S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2019.03.009 · Cited by 85
Cognitive Similarity-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation System
Nguyen, L. V., Hong, M., Jung, J. J., & Sohn, B.-S. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10124183 · Cited by 84
“According to [35], we decided k is set as 5 because yield test error rate estimates that suffer neither from excessively high bias nor very high variance.”
BackgroundSupervised machine learning methods in psychology: A practical introduction with annotated R code
Rosenbusch, H., Soldner, F., Evans, A. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2021) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12579 · Cited by 101
Escobar-Hernandez, H. U., Pérez, L. M., Hu, P., Soto, F. A., Papadaki, M. I., Zhou, H.-C. “., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00561 · Cited by 88
Luo, G. (2016) · Health Information Science and Systems · doi:10.1186/s13755-016-0015-4 · Cited by 85
“often achieve the highest prediction accuracy [8].”
Influence of Input‐Scrap Quality on the Environmental Impact of Secondary Steel Production
Haupt, M., Vadenbo, C., Zeltner, C., & Hellweg, S. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12439 · Cited by 83
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, T., Wang, J., Hong, Y., Fei, T., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs11040450 · Cited by 89
A survey-based analysis of the academic job market
Fernandes, J. D., Sarabipour, S., Smith, C. T., Niemi, N. M., Jadavji, N. M., Kozik, A. J., Holehouse, A. S., Pejaver, V. R., Symmons, O., Bisson‐Filho, A. W., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54097 · Cited by 90
Schultz, M., Reitmann, S., & Alam, S. (2021) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103119 · Cited by 90
Salari, N., Liu, S., & Shen, Z. M. (2022) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.1081 · Cited by 84
Resolution in species distribution models shapes spatial patterns of plant multifaceted diversity
Chauvier, Y., Descombes, P., Guéguen, M., Boulangeat, L., Thuiller, W., & Zimmermann, N. E. (2022) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05973 · Cited by 91
A Novel Machine Learning Approach for Solar Radiation Estimation
Hissou, H., Benkirane, S., Guezzaz, A., et al. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151310609 · Cited by 84
“This involves the following steps [64]:”
Lyu, H., Wan, M., Han, J., et al. (2017) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.021 · Cited by 83
Channel pruning based on mean gradient for accelerating Convolutional Neural Networks
Liu, C., & Wu, H. (2018) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.10.019 · Cited by 82
Zhao, C., Wan, C., & Song, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2019.2924355 · Cited by 83
Predicting Node Failures in an Ultra-Large-Scale Cloud Computing Platform
Li, Y., Jiang, Z. M., Li, H., Hassan, A. E., He, C., Huang, R., Zeng, Z., Wang, M., & Chen, P. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3385187 · Cited by 83
Forecasting recovery rates on non-performing loans with machine learning
Bellotti, A. G., Brigo, D., Gambetti, P., & Vrins, F. D. (2020) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.009 · Cited by 82
Talwar, S., Talwar, M., Tarjanne, V., & Dhir, A. (2021) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21550 · Cited by 98
Colaresi, M., & Mahmood, Z. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343316682065 · Cited by 82
Games and Economic BehaviorPreprint
NOUSSAIR, C. N., de Castro, L. I., & Galvao, A. F. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5009629 · Cited by 86
Lolon, E., Hamidieh, K., Weijers, L., et al. (2016) · SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition · doi:10.2118/179171-ms · Cited by 82
Real-time forecasting of epidemic trajectories using computational dynamic ensembles
Chowell, G., Luo, R., Sun, K., Roosa, K. M., Tariq, A., & Viboud, C. G. (2019) · Epidemics · doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2019.100379 · Cited by 77
Filgueiras, R., Almeida, T. S., Mantovani, E. C., Dias, S. H. B., Filho, E. I. F., da Cunha, F. F., & Venâncio, L. P. (2020) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106346 · Cited by 81
Spacecraft collision avoidance challenge: Design and results of a machine learning competition
Uriot, T., Izzo, D., Simões, L. F., Abay, R., Einecke, N., Rebhan, S., Martinez-Heras, J. A., Letizia, F., Siminski, J., & Merz, K. (2021) · Astrodynamics · doi:10.1007/s42064-021-0101-5 · Cited by 85
Velasco-Gallego, C., & Lazakis, I. (2020) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108261 · Cited by 84
A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of multi-leaf collimator positional errors
Carlson, J., Park, J. M., Park, S. Y., Park, J. M., Choi, Y., & Ye, S. (2016) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/6/2514 · Cited by 83
“There are several other optimizations, and the algorithm in its entirety is described in detail in Kuhn and Johnson (2013).”
Method(2020) · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.12.005 · Cited by 78
“It is important to randomly reserve a portion of the whole data set to be included in the independent test set (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
Langone, R., Cuzzocrea, A., & Skantzos, N. (2020) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2020.101850 · Cited by 81
Harris, T. D., & Graham, J. L. (2017) · Lake and Reservoir Management · doi:10.1080/10402381.2016.1263694 · Cited by 81
“To avoid collinearity between potential explanatory variables, all explanatory variables with correlation coefficients >|0.75| were removed from further analyses as per Kuhn and Johnson (2013).”
MethodInfluentialHülsmann, L., Bugmann, H. K. M., Cailleret, M., & Brang, P. (2017) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1668 · Cited by 78
Constitutive modelling of cemented paste backfill: A data-mining approach
Qi, C., Chen, Q., Fourie, A. B., Tang, X., Zhang, Q., Dong, X., & Feng, Y. P. (2018) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.142 · Cited by 81
Neufeind, J., Betsch, C., Habersaat, K. B., Eckardt, M., Schmid, P., & Wichmann, O. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.052 · Cited by 82
AI in actuarial science – a review of recent advances – part 2
Richman, R. (2020) · Annals of Actuarial Science · doi:10.1017/s174849952000024x · Cited by 80
Machine Learning Thermobarometry for Biotite‐Bearing Magmas
Li, X., & Zhang, C. (2022) · Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2022jb024137 · Cited by 81
“This method usually results in lower variance and higher bias compared with repeated k-fold cross-validation (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013).”
MethodA Human(e) Factor in Clinical Decision Support Systems
Bezemer, T., de Groot, M., Blasse, E., ten Berg, M. J., Kappen, T. H., Bredenoord, A. L., van Solinge, W. W., Hoefer, I. E., & Haitjema, S. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/11732 · Cited by 86
“Unfortunately, there is a trade-off between attainable model complexity and model interpretability [20].”
BackgroundDelzell, D. A. P., Magnuson, S., Peter, T., Smith, M., & Smith, B. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.01393 · Cited by 83
Demir, S., & Şahin, E. K. (2021) · Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107130 · Cited by 80
Combination of Machine Learning and Kriging for Spatial Estimation of Geological Attributes
Erten, G. E., Yavuz, M., & Deutsch, C. V. (2022) · Natural Resources Research · doi:10.1007/s11053-021-10003-w · Cited by 85
“The difference of this algorithm from the cross-validation partitioning method (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013) is that the drill holes are assigned to the folds in their entirety.”
MethodThe Optimal Phenological Phase of Maize for Yield Prediction with High-Frequency UAV Remote Sensing
Yang, B. T., Zhu, W., Rezaei, E. E., Li, J., Sun, Z., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14071559 · Cited by 84
Naser, A. H., Badr, A. H., Henedy, S. N., Ostrowski, K. A., & Imran, H. (2022) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01262 · Cited by 81
Importance of conserving large and old trees to continuity of tree‐related microhabitats
Kozák, D., Svitok, M., Zemlerová, V., et al. (2023) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.14066 · Cited by 80
“Fivefold cross-validated RMSE and BS values were calculated to ensure unbiased estimates of predictive performance (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013).”
MethodExhaled breath condensate biomarkers for the early diagnosis of lung cancer using proteomics
Lopez-Sanchez, L. M., Gámez, B. J., Collado, N. F., Valverde, A. M., Cañas, A., Fernández-Rueda, J. L., Aranda, E., & Rodríguez‐Ariza, A. (2017) · American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajplung.00119.2017 · Cited by 82
Enhanced Selection of Assistance and Explosive Detection Dogs Using Cognitive Measures
MacLean, E. L., & Hare, B. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2018.00236 · Cited by 80
Global estimation of long-term persistence in annual river runoff
Markonis, Y., Moustakis, Y., Nasika, C., Sychová, P., Dimitriadis, P., Hanel, M., Máca, P., & Papalexiou, S. M. (2018) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.01.003 · Cited by 77
Prediction of transportation energy demand: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
Sahraei, M. A., Duman, H., Çodur, M. Y., et al. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120090 · Cited by 79
Relativistic Electron Model in the Outer Radiation Belt Using a Neural Network Approach
Chu, X., Ma, D., Bortnik, J., et al. (2021) · Space Weather · doi:10.1029/2021sw002808 · Cited by 79
“The process of feature selection used here is primarily based on the strategy of adding the most informative predictors for the ORIENT-R model (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013) and assessing its performance.”
MethodNiri, M. F., Liu, K., Apachitei, G., Román‐Ramírez, L. A., Lain, M. J., Widanage, W. D., & Marco, J. (2021) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100129 · Cited by 79
“CV is based on resampling procedure and very suitable for dealing with limited data samples, it results in less biased estimations and avoids the unnecessary optimism [59].”
MethodCoins for Bombs: The Predictive Ability of On‐Chain Transfers for Terrorist Attacks
Amiram, D., Jorgensen, B. N., & Rabetti, D. (2022) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12430 · Cited by 78
An intelligent DDoS attack detection tree-based model using Gini index feature selection method
Bouke, M. A., Abdullah, A., ALshatebi, S. H., Abdullah, M. T., & Atigh, H. E. (2023) · Microprocessors and Microsystems · doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2023.104823 · Cited by 85
Stratified aboveground forest biomass estimation by remote sensing data
Latifi, H., Fassnacht, F. E., Hartig, F., Berger, C. R., Hernández, J., Corvalán, P., & Koch, B. (2015) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.01.016 · Cited by 79
“, 2004), RandomForest (Liaw and Wiener, 2012) and caret (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
MethodPredicting Arsenic in Drinking Water Wells of the Central Valley, California
Ayotte, J. D., Nolan, B. T., & Gronberg, J. A. M. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b01914 · Cited by 82
Anderson, G. B., Oleson, K. W., Jones, B., & Peng, R. D. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1779-x · Cited by 85
“We used Monte Carlo cross-validation to assess performance of these models (Kuhn and Johnson 2013) and selected four health-based classification models to use in the current study.”
Statistical Design of Experiments for Screening and Optimization
Lee, R. (2019) · Chemie Ingenieur Technik · doi:10.1002/cite.201800100 · Cited by 78
Quiñones, S., Goyal, A., & Ahmed, Z. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85381-5 · Cited by 77
Westhues, C. C., Mahone, G. S., Silva, S. D., Thorwarth, P., Schmidt, M., Richter, J.-C., Simianer, H., & Beissinger, T. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.699589 · Cited by 81
Guerra-Hernández, J., Narine, L. L., Pascual, A., et al. (2022) · GIScience & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/15481603.2022.2115599 · Cited by 78
“This function creates balanced splits in the data by ensuring that random sampling occurs within each forest type while also preserving the overall class distribution over the data set (Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
BackgroundZhou, J. P., Shi, X., HUANG, R.-D., et al. (2016) · Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China · doi:10.1016/s1003-6326(16)64312-1 · Cited by 78
Iniesta, R., Hodgson, K., Stahl, D. R., Malki, K., Maier, W., Rietschel, M., Mors, O. N., Hauser, J., Henigsberg, N., Dernovšek, M. Z., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23584-z · Cited by 78
Predictive Modelling of Training Loads and Injury in Australian Football
Carey, D. L., Ong, K., Whiteley, R. J., Crossley, K. M., Crow, J., & Morris, M. E. (2018) · Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport · doi:10.2478/ijcss-2018-0002 · Cited by 81
“Principal component analysis (PCA) is a dimensionality reduction process that reduces a large number of predictor variables to a smaller number of uncorrelated variables [21] and has been employed in studies of training load monitoring [29].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMason, C., Twomey, J. M., Wright, D., & Whitman, L. (2017) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9473-z · Cited by 81
Parsa, M., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2021) · Natural Resources Research · doi:10.1007/s11053-021-09891-9 · Cited by 78
“These imply that the modulated predictive model’s generalization was improved compared to the model derived by a single NBC (cf. Kuhn & Johnson, 2013), which is linked to generation of diverse pseudoreplicates from the original deposit and non-deposit cells that facilitate the model s…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAbu-Salih, B., Wongthongtham, P., Morrison, G. M., Coutinho, K., Al‐Okaily, M., & Huneiti, A. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09152 · Cited by 81
“This is through using data samples that were not used to build the model, the aim is to provide an unbiased evaluation of final model effectiveness [89], by means of evaluating the final hypothesis by an independent evaluation [90].”
MethodA Deep Transfer Learning Based Architecture for Brain Tumor Classification Using MR Images
Badjie, B., & Ülker, E. D. (2022) · Information Technology And Control · doi:10.5755/j01.itc.51.2.30835 · Cited by 76
Kattenborn, T., Maack, J., Fassnacht, F. E., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2014.10.008 · Cited by 77
Coronel-Reyes, J., Ramírez-Morales, I., Fernández-Blanco, E., Rivero, D., & Pazos, A. (2017) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2017.12.030 · Cited by 77
“(Kuhn and Johnson, 2013, Refaeilzadeh et al., 2009).”
MethodDashing hopes? The predictive accuracy of domestic abuse risk assessment by police
Turner, E., Medina, J., & Brown, G. (2019) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azy074 · Cited by 78
Li, J. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.004 · Cited by 77
“With the advancement in computing technology and modelling techniques (Crawley, 2007; Hastie et al., 2009; Kuhn and Johnson, 2013) and development in remote sensing and geographic information systems, predictive models have been increasingly employed for making spatially continuous predictions in…”
MethodA hybrid ensemble method for improved prediction of slope stability
Qi, C., & Tang, X. (2018) · International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · doi:10.1002/nag.2834 · Cited by 76
Girona, M. M., Morin, H., Lussier, J.-M., & Ruel, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2019.00004 · Cited by 72
Schultebraucks, K., & Galatzer‐Levy, I. R. (2019) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22384 · Cited by 78
Stock, B. C., Ward, E. J., Eguchi, T., Jannot, J. E., Thorson, J. T., Feist, B. E., & Semmens, B. X. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2018-0281 · Cited by 74
Shafizadeh‐Moghadam, H., Weng, Q., Liu, H., & Valavi, R. (2020) · GIScience & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/15481603.2020.1736857 · Cited by 76
“…NDBI and NDVI which can potentially take values between −1 and 1 are calculated as follows; Lλ ¼ gain DNþ offset (1) NDBI ¼ b6 b5 b6þ b5 (2) NDVI ¼ b5 b4 b5þ b4 (3) Collinearity and multicollinearity can add more complexity to themodel and influence themodel’s performance (Kuhn and Johnson 2013).”
BackgroundSankar, S., Balamurugan, D., Brown, A. J. V., Ding, K., Xu, X., Low, J.-H., Yeow, C., & Thakor, N. V. (2020) · Soft Robotics · doi:10.1089/soro.2020.0016 · Cited by 78
“55,56 This procedure randomly splits the data set into k groups.”
A critical review of decision support systems for brownfield redevelopment
Hammond, E. B., Coulon, F., Hallett, S. H., Thomas, R., Hardy, D., Kingdon, A., & Beriro, D. J. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147132 · Cited by 74
“Some example applications include image classification, forecasting stock prices, simulating recovery rates in patients, and modelling fluid dynamic systems (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialBourel, M., Segura, A. M., Crisci, C., López, G., Sampognaro, L., Vidal, V., Kruk, C., Piccini, C., & Perera, G. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117450 · Cited by 75
Baltensweiler, A., Walthert, L., Hanewinkel, M., Zimmermann, S., & Nussbaum, M. (2021) · Geoderma Regional · doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00437 · Cited by 83
Mao, Y.-J., Lim, H.-J., Ni, M., Yan, W.-H., Wong, D. W., & Cheung, J. C. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14020367 · Cited by 80
“In the case of cross-validation (a bootstrap approach), the training, validation and testing datasets are nested without data splitting [91] and have been recommended for small sample sizes (e.”
MethodTran, V. Q. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131683 · Cited by 77
Artificial Intelligence in Periodontology: A Scoping Review
Scott, J., Biancardi, A., Jones, O. P. H., & Andrew, D. (2023) · Dentistry Journal · doi:10.3390/dj11020043 · Cited by 88
Tseng, C.-J., Lu, C.-J., Chang, C.-C., Chen, G.-D., & Cheewakriangkrai, C. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.06.003 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W429766147
- Cited by
- 6,788
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 564 · 2025: 813 · 2024: 727 · 2023: 776 · 2022: 810 · 2021: 815 · 2020: 715 · 2019: 492 · 2018: 382 · 2017: 271 · 2016: 198 · 2015: 156 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 32.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Keywords
- predictive modeling, data preprocessing, data partitioning, model calibration, model selection, model evaluation, classification, regression analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review