Cited by 7Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

Formal Models of Age Differences in Task-Complexity Effects

Kliegl, Reinhold, Krampe, Ralf T., Mayr, Ulrich·2003·Understanding Human Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-0357-6_13

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kliegl, R., Krampe, R. T., & Mayr, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Understanding Human Development
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2003
Pages
289-313
OpenAlex
W1888339043
Cited by
7
References
77
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive aging, age differences, task complexity, age invariance, baseline effects, movement timing, functional dissociation, selection, optimization, and compensation, quasi-experimental design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review