Cited by 566Aging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Aging and Cognitive Deficits

Craik, Fergus I. M., Byrd, Mark·1982·Aging and Cognitive Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4684-4178-9_11

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craik, F. I. M., & Byrd, M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Aging and Cognitive Processes
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1982
Pages
191-211
OpenAlex
W122164180
Cited by
566
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.67
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive aging, age-related cognitive decline, cognitive impairment, cohort effects, formal education, nervous system aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review