The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Methods for Classification, Prediction, and Design of Antimicrobial Peptides
Open accessAbstract
Peptides with diverse amino acid sequences, structures and functions are essential players in biological systems. The construction of well-annotated databases not only facilitates effective information management, search and mining, but also lays the foundation for developing and testing new peptide algorithms and machines. The antimicrobial peptide database (APD) is an original construction in terms of both database design and peptide entries. The host defense antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) registered in the APD cover the five kingdoms (bacteria, protists, fungi, plants, and animals) or three domains of life (bacteria, archaea, and eukaryota). This comprehensive database (http://aps.unmc.edu/AP) provides useful information on peptide discovery timeline, nomenclature, classification, glossary, calculation tools, and statistics. The APD enables effective search, prediction, and design of peptides with antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antiparasitic, insecticidal, spermicidal, anticancer activities, chemotactic, immune modulation, or anti-oxidative properties. A universal classification scheme is proposed herein to unify innate immunity peptides from a variety of biological sources. As an improvement, the upgraded APD makes predictions based on the database-defined parameter space and provides a list of the sequences most similar to natural AMPs. In addition, the powerful pipeline design of the database search engine laid a solid basis for designing novel antimicrobials to combat resistant superbugs, viruses, fungi or parasites. This comprehensive AMP database is a useful tool for both research and education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Cited by
APD3: the antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education
Wang, G., Li, X., & Wang, Z. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1278 · Cited by 2,388
Self-citationAntimicrobial peptides for combating drug-resistant bacterial infections
Xuan, J., Feng, W., Wang, J., Wang, R., Zhang, B., Bo, L., Chen, Z.-S., Yang, H., & Sun, L. (2023) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2023.100954 · Cited by 665
Gan, B. H., Gaynord, J., Rowe, S. M., Deingruber, T., & Spring, D. R. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00729c · Cited by 511
Antimicrobial Peptides: An Update on Classifications and Databases
Bin Hafeez, A., Jiang, X., Bergen, P. J., & Zhu, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222111691 · Cited by 341
Host defense antimicrobial peptides as antibiotics: design and application strategies
Mishra, B., Reiling, S., Zarena, D., & Wang, G. (2017) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.03.014 · Cited by 299
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, G.
- Venue
- Methods in Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2014-12-11
- Volume
- 1268
- Pages
- 43-66
- ISSN
- 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6029
- OpenAlex
- W197978049
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.85
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Methods for Classification, Prediction, and Design of Antimicrobial Peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4939-2285-7_3
- The paper
- Wang, G. (2015). Improved Methods for Classification, Prediction, and Design of Antimicrobial Peptides. Methods in Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2285-7_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.