Cited by 9Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Mapping Biological Networks from Quantitative Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry: Data to Knowledge Pipelines

Open access
Crowgey, Erin L., Matlock, Andrea, Venkatraman, Vidya, Fert-Bober, Justyna, Van Eyk, Jennifer E.·2017·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) strategies and applications provide unique advantages for qualitative and quantitative proteome probing of a biological sample allowing constant sensitivity and reproducibility across large sample sets. These advantages in LC-MS/MS are being realized in fundamental research laboratories and for clinical research applications. However, the ability to translate high-throughput raw LC-MS/MS proteomic data into biological knowledge is a complex and difficult task requiring the use of many algorithms and tools for which there is no widely accepted standard and best practices are slowly being implemented. Today a single tool or approach inherently fails to capture the full interpretation that proteomics uniquely supplies, including the dynamics of quickly reversible chemically modified states of proteins, irreversible amino acid modifications, signaling truncation events, and, finally, determining the presence of protein from allele-specific transcripts. This chapter highlights key steps and publicly available algorithms required to translate DIA-MS data into knowledge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-6783-4_19

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DIA results in identification of nearly all detectable peptides within a selected mass range, allowing comprehensive and accurate quantification of identified proteins with minimal missing values.

    “Therefore, DIA results in the identification of nearly all detectable peptides within a selected mass range, allowing for comprehensive and accurate quantification of identified proteins in the sample with minimal missing values [81, 82].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Fert-Bober J, Giles JT, Holewinski RJ, (2015) Citrullination of myofilament proteins in heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 108: 232– 42. 10.1093/cvr/cvv185 26113265 PMC4614685 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crowgey, E. L., Matlock, A., Venkatraman, V., Fert-Bober, J., & Van Eyk, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Crowgey, Erin L.
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published
2017
Volume
1558
Pages
395-413
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2585647902
Cited by
9
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.48
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL101235, R01HL132075)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, quantitative proteomics, protein chemical modification, amino acid modification, protein truncation
MeSH terms
Peptides, Software, Mass Spectrometry, User-Computer Interface, Computational Biology, Gene Regulatory Networks, Data Mining, Protein Interaction Maps, Web Browser

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review