Cited by 5Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Detection and quantitative analysis of dynamic GPCRs interactions using flow cytometry-based FRET

Chruścicka, Barbara, Wallace Fitzsimons, Shauna E., Druelle, Clémentine M., Dinan, Timothy G., Schellekens, Harriët·2018·Neuromethods

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-8576-0_14

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chruścicka, B., Wallace Fitzsimons, S. E., Druelle, C. M., Dinan, T. G., & Schellekens, H.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Schellekens, Harriët
Venue
Neuromethods
Published
2018
Pages
223-238
ISSN
  • 0893-2336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6045
OpenAlex
W2886832765
Cited by
5
References
66
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.35
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neuromethods (publishedVersion)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Keywords
G protein-coupled receptors, receptor-receptor interactions, central nervous system, neuropsychopharmacology, brain disorders, depression, schizophrenia, addiction, anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review