The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Regularization of Neural Networks
Abstract
Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks (BRANNs) are more robust than standard back-propagation nets and can reduce or eliminate the need for lengthy cross-validation. Bayesian regularization is a mathematical process that converts a nonlinear regression into a "well-posed" statistical problem in the manner of a ridge regression. The advantage of BRANNs is that the models are robust and the validation process, which scales as O(N2) in normal regression methods, such as back propagation, is unnecessary. These networks provide solutions to a number of problems that arise in QSAR modeling, such as choice of model, robustness of model, choice of validation set, size of validation effort, and optimization of network architecture. They are difficult to overtrain, since evidence procedures provide an objective Bayesian criterion for stopping training. They are also difficult to overfit, because the BRANN calculates and trains on a number of effective network parameters or weights, effectively turning off those that are not relevant. This effective number is usually considerably smaller than the number of weights in a standard fully connected back-propagation neural net. Automatic relevance determination (ARD) of the input variables can be used with BRANNs, and this allows the network to "estimate" the importance of each input. The ARD method ensures that irrelevant or highly correlated indices used in the modeling are neglected as well as showing which are the most important variables for modeling the activity data. This chapter outlines the equations that define the BRANN method plus a flowchart for producing a BRANN-QSAR model. Some results of the use of BRANNs on a number of data sets are illustrated and compared with other linear and nonlinear models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks for pattern recognition
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-5500 · Cited by 18,538
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 · Cited by 4,388
Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks
Neal, R. M. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0745-0 · Cited by 4,276
Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity—a rapid access to atomic charges
Gasteiger, J., & Marsili, M. (1980) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/0040-4020(80)80168-2 · Cited by 4,157
A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.448 · Cited by 2,917
Netlab: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition
Nabney, I. T. (2002) · Cited by 982
Assessing Model Fit by Cross-Validation
Hawkins, D. M., Basak, S. C., & Mills, D. (2003) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci025626i · Cited by 757
van Rossum, G., & Python Dev Team (1999) · Cited by 367
Molecular identification number for substructure searches
Burden, F. R. (1989) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci00063a011 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Cited by
Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models
Alexander, D. L. J., Tropsha, A., & Winkler, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00206 · Cited by 745
Self-citationDeep Learning in Drug Discovery
Gawehn, E., Hiss, J. A., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201501008 · Cited by 723
A Bayesian regularized artificial neural network for stock market forecasting
Ticknor, J. L. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.013 · Cited by 517
Demystifying Multitask Deep Neural Networks for Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships
Xu, Y., Ma, J., Liaw, A., Sheridan, R. P., & Svetnik, V. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00087 · Cited by 238
A renaissance of neural networks in drug discovery
Baskin, I. I., Winkler, D., & Tetko, I. V. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2016.1201262 · Cited by 235
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Burden, F., & Winkler, D.
- Venue
- Methods in Molecular Biology™
- Publisher
- Humana Press
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 458
- Pages
- 23-42
- ISSN
- 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6029
- OpenAlex
- W37018364
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Regularization of Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_3
- The paper
- Burden, F., & Winkler, D. (2008). Bayesian Regularization of Neural Networks. Methods in Molecular Biology™. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.