Cited by 18Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchInflammasome and immune disorders

Isolation and Culture of Adult Human Microglia Within Mixed Glial Cultures for Functional Experimentation and High-Content Analysis

Smith, Amy M., Gibbons, Hannah M., Lill, Claire, Faull, Richard L. M., Dragunow, Mike·2013·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Microglia are thought to be involved in diseases of the adult human brain as well as normal aging processes. While neonatal and rodent microglia are often used in studies investigating microglial function, there are important differences between rodent microglia and their adult human counterparts. Human brain tissue provides a unique and valuable tool for microglial cell and molecular biology. Routine protocols can now enable use of this culture method in many laboratories. Detailed protocols and advice for culture of human brain microglia are provided here. We demonstrate the protocol for culturing human adult microglia within a mixed glial culture and use a phagocytosis assay as an example of the functional studies possible with these cells as well as a high-content analysis method of quantification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-62703-520-0_6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primary human microglia are poorly characterized, differ greatly from mature mouse microglia, are not easily accessible, and current isolation methods likely alter their defining characteristics.

    “primary human microglia remain poorly characterized as they differ greatly from mature mouse microglia, are not easily accessible and current methods employed for isolation likely alter their defining characteristics6.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, A. M., Gibbons, H. M., Lill, C., Faull, R. L. M., & Dragunow, M.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2013
Volume
1041
Pages
41-51
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2397793632
Cited by
18
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.18
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Centre
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
Keywords
human microglia, microglia isolation, mixed glial cultures, adult human brain, phagocytosis assay, high-content analysis, microglial function, microglial aging
MeSH terms
Brain, Cell Separation, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Neuroglia, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review