CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synaptic Partner Prediction from Point Annotations in Insect Brains

Buhmann, Julia, Krause, Renate, Lentini, Rodrigo Ceballos, Eckstein, Nils, Cook, Matthew, Turaga, Srinivas, Funke, Jan·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_35
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_35

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Becker, C., Ali, K., Knott, G., Fua, P.: Learning context cues for synapse segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32(10), 1864–1877 (2013) · DOI
  2. Funke, J., et al.: Large scale image segmentation with structured loss based deep learning for connectome reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. (early access). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2835450 · DOI
  3. Huang, G.B., Scheffer, L.K., Plaza, S.M.: Fully-automatic synapse prediction and validation on a large data set. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.03075 (2016) · arXiv
  4. Jagadeesh, V., Anderson, J., Jones, B., Marc, R., Fisher, S., Manjunath, B.: Synapse classification and localization in electron micrographs. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 43, 17–24 (2014) · DOI
  5. Januszewski, M., Maitin-Shepard, J., Li, P., Kornfeld, J., Denk, W., Jain, V.: Flood-filling networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00421 (2016) · arXiv
  6. Kasthuri, N., et al.: Saturated reconstruction of a volume of neocortex. Cell 162(3), 648–661 (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. CoRR abs/1412.6980 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980 · arXiv
  8. Kreshuk, A., Funke, J., Cardona, A., Hamprecht, F.A.: Who is talking to whom: synaptic partner detection in anisotropic volumes of insect brain. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9349, pp. 661–668. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_81 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kreshuk, A., Koethe, U., Pax, E., Bock, D.D., Hamprecht, F.A.: Automated detection of synapses in serial section transmission electron microscopy image stacks. PloS One 9(2), e87351 (2014) · DOI
  10. Kreshuk, A.: Automated detection and segmentation of synaptic contacts in nearly isotropic serial electron microscopy images. PloS One 6(10), e24899 (2011) · DOI
  11. Roncal, W.G., et al.: Vesicle: volumetric evaluation of synaptic interfaces using computer vision at large scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.3724 (2014) · DOI
  12. Staffler, B., Berning, M., Boergens, K.M., Gour, A., van der Smagt, P., Helmstaedter, M.: Synem, automated synapse detection for connectomics. eLife 6, e26414 (2017) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Buhmann, J., Krause, R., Lentini, R. C., Eckstein, N., Cook, M., Turaga, S., & Funke, J.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2018
Pages
309-316
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_35
Cited by
15
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review