Cited by 75Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Factorised Spatial Representation Learning: Application in Semi-supervised Myocardial Segmentation

Open access
Chartsias, Agisilaos, Joyce, Thomas, Papanastasiou, Giorgos, Semple, Scott, Williams, Michelle, Newby, David, Dharmakumar, Rohan, Tsaftaris, Sotirios A.·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_55

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [6]6. Chen, X., Duan, Y., Houthooft, R., Schulman, J., Sutskever, I., and Abbeel, P.: Infogan: Interpretable representation learning by information maximizing generative adversarial nets. In: NIPS, pp. 2172-2180 (2016)
  2. [11]11. Kim, H., and Mnih, A.: Disentangling by factorising. ICML (2018)
  3. [12]12. Luc, P., Couprie, C., Chintala, S., and Verbeek, J.: Semantic segmentation using adversarial networks. NIPS Workshop (2016)
  4. [14]14. Mathieu, M.F., Zhao, J.J., Zhao, J., Ramesh, A., Sprechmann, P., and LeCun, Y.: Disentangling factors of variation in deep representation using adversarial training. In: NIPS, pp. 5040-5048 (2016)
  5. [19]19. Vondrick, C., Pirsiavash, H., and Torralba, A.: Generating videos with scene dynamics. In: NIPS, pp. 613-621 (2016)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chartsias, A., Joyce, T., Papanastasiou, G., Semple, S., Williams, M., Newby, D., Dharmakumar, R., & Tsaftaris, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • The Queen's Medical Research Institute (GB)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Chartsias, Agisilaos
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
490-498
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2790284322
Cited by
75
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P022928/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
cycle consistency, spatial representation learning, myocardium segmentation, cardiac MRI, semi-supervised learning, scanner variability, ACDC dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review