Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PSANet: Point-wise Spatial Attention Network for Scene Parsing

Zhao, Hengshuang, Zhang, Yi, Liu, Shu, Shi, Jianping, Loy, Chen Change, Lin, Dahua, Jia, Jiaya·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-01240-3_17

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Chandra, S., Kokkinos, I.: Fast, exact and multi-scale inference for semantic image segmentation with deep Gaussian CRFs. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) ECCV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9911, pp. 402–418. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_25 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chandra, S., Usunier, N., Kokkinos, I.: Dense and low-rank Gaussian CRFs using deep embeddings. In: ICCV (2017) · DOI
  3. Chen, L.C., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., Adam, H.: Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation (2017). arXiv:1706.05587 · arXiv
  4. Chen, L., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Xu, W., Yuille, A.L.: Attention to scale: scale-aware semantic image segmentation. In: CVPR (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gadde, R., Jampani, V., Gehler, P.V.: Semantic video CNNs through representation warping. In: ICCV (2017) · DOI
  6. Hariharan, B., Arbelaez, P., Bourdev, L.D., Maji, S., Malik, J.: Semantic contours from inverse detectors. In: ICCV (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Jia, Y., et al.: Caffe: convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In: ACM MM (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jin, X., et al.: Video scene parsing with predictive feature learning. In: ICCV (2017) · DOI
  9. Kendall, A., Gal, Y., Cipolla, R.: Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics. In: CVPR (2018)
  10. Krähenbühl, P., Koltun, V.: Efficient inference in fully connected CRFs with Gaussian edge potentials. In: NIPS (2011)
  11. Li, X., Liu, Z., Luo, P., Loy, C.C., Tang, X.: Not all pixels are equal: difficulty-aware semantic segmentation via deep layer cascade. In: CVPR (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lin, T.Y., et al.: Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8693, pp. 740–755. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Liu, W., Rabinovich, A., Berg, A.C.: ParseNet: looking wider to see better (2015). arXiv:1506.04579 · arXiv
  14. Liu, Z., Li, X., Luo, P., Loy, C.C., Tang, X.: Semantic image segmentation via deep parsing network. In: ICCV (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: CVPR (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Mnih, V., Heess, N., Graves, A., et al.: Recurrent models of visual attention. In: NIPS (2014)
  17. Noh, H., Hong, S., Han, B.: Learning deconvolution network for semantic segmentation. In: ICCV (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  18. Pohlen, T., Hermans, A., Mathias, M., Leibe, B.: Full-resolution residual networks for semantic segmentation in street scenes. In: CVPR (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  19. Shen, F., Gan, R., Yan, S., Zeng, G.: Semantic segmentation via structured patch prediction, context CRF and guidance CRF. In: CVPR (2017) · DOI
  20. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: ICLR (2015)
  21. Szegedy, C., et al.: Going deeper with convolutions. In: CVPR (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  22. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: NIPS (2017)
  23. Visin, F., et al.: ReSeg: a recurrent neural network-based model for semantic segmentation. In: CVPR Workshop (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  24. Wang, P., et al.: Understanding convolution for semantic segmentation. In: WACV (2018) · DOI · Paper page
  25. Wu, Z., Shen, C., van den Hengel, A.: Wider or deeper: revisiting the ResNet model for visual recognition (2016). arXiv:1611.10080 · arXiv
  26. Zhao, H., Qi, X., Shen, X., Shi, J., Jia, J.: ICNet for real-time semantic segmentation on high-resolution images. In: ECCV (2018) · DOI · Paper page
  27. Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X., Jia, J.: Pyramid scene parsing network. In: CVPR (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  28. Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, À., Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Object detectors emerge in deep scene CNNs. In: ICLR (2015)
  29. Zhou, B., Zhao, H., Puig, X., Fidler, S., Barriuso, A., Torralba, A.: Scene parsing through ADE20K dataset. In: CVPR (2017) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,192

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Shi, J., Loy, C. C., Lin, D., & Jia, J.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
270-286
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2895340641
Cited by
1,192
References
19
FWCI
35.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PSANet: Point-wise Spatial Attention Network for Scene Parsing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-030-01240-3_17
The paper
Zhao, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Shi, J., Loy, C. C., Lin, D., & Jia, J. (2018). PSANet: Point-wise Spatial Attention Network for Scene Parsing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01240-3_17

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.