CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and Education

The ‘Online Othering’ of Transgender People in Relation to ‘Gender Neutral Toilets’

Open access
Colliver, Ben, Coyle, Adrian, Silvestri, Marisa·2019·Online Othering
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9_9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9_9

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The topos of threat is common to both homophobia and transphobia.

    “The topos of threat is common to both homophobia and transphobia (Lillian, 2005; Brindle, 2016; Colliver et al., 2019; Konopka et al., 2019; Baider, 2018, 2025).”

    From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Colliver et al., 2019

  • The frames identified in the authors' research are similar to those found in Colliver et al.'s (2019) study focused on transphobic speech.

    “These frames are similar to those found in Colliver et al. 's (2019) study focused on transphobic speech.”

    From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Colliver et al.'s (2019)

  • The frames identified in the transphobic discourse are like the ones identified in other online discourse focused on trans people but for a different topic such as gender-neutral toilets.

    “However, as mentioned before, we have witnessed that the frames identified in the transphobic discourse are like the ones identified in other online discourse focused on trans people but for a different topic such as gender-neutral toilets (Colliver et al., 2019).”

    From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Colliver et al., 2019

  • The cognitive frames and affective patterns observed are not surprising; they concur with previous research focused on frames and studies focused on affective rhetoric and discriminatory discourse such as sexism.

    “However, the cognitive frames and the affective patterns observed are not surprising; they concur with previous research focused on frames (Colliver et al., 2019) and studies focused on affective rhetoric and discriminatory discourse such as sexism (Saresma and Tulonen, 2022).”

    From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Colliver et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jefferson G (1990) List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (ed) Interaction Competence . Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 63-92.
  2. Taylor G (2002) Psychopathology and the social and historical construction of gay male identities. In: Coyle A and Kitzinger C (eds) Lesbian & Gay Psychology: New Perspectives . Oxford: BPS Blackwell, 154-174.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Colliver, B., Coyle, A., & Silvestri, M.
Affiliations
  • Birmingham City University (GB)
  • Kingston University London (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Online Othering
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2019
Pages
215-237
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9_9
OpenAlex
W2901836460
Cited by
23
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
22.88
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Palgrave Macmillan eBooks
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
transgender people, delegitimization, YouTube comments, victimhood, discursive resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review