Cited by 127Technology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionAI in Service Interactions

Understanding the Role of Privacy and Trust in Intelligent Personal Assistant Adoption

Liao, Yuting, Vitak, Jessica, Kumar, Priya, Zimmer, Michael, Kritikos, Katherine·2019·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_9

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, Y., Vitak, J., Kumar, P., Zimmer, M., & Kritikos, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Liao, Yuting
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2019
Pages
102-113
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2922503844
Cited by
127
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4
FWCI
40.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
virtual assistants, voice assistants, technology adoption, privacy concerns, trust, social contract theory, technology acceptance, data privacy, adoption motivations, barriers to adoption, smart speakers, smartphones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review