Cited by 52AI in Service InteractionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systems

Chatbot Personalities Matters: Improving the User Experience of Chatbot Interfaces

Smestad, Tuva Lunde, Volden, Frode·2019·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_15

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smestad, T. L., & Volden, F.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Smestad, Tuva Lunde
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2019
Pages
170-181
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2935711174
Cited by
52
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
chatbots, chatbot personality, personality matching, user experience, chatbot interface, context sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review