Cited by 76Digital Platforms and EconomicsDigital Economy and Work TransformationICT Impact and Policies

Digital Platforms in the Global South: Foundations and Research Agenda

Open access
Koskinen, Kari, Bonina, Carla, Eaton, Ben·2019·IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-18400-1_26

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koskinen, K., Bonina, C., & Eaton, B.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Bonina, Carla
Venue
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
Published
2019
Volume
AICT-551
Issue
Part I
Pages
319-330
ISSN
  • 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-4238
OpenAlex
W2940616166
Cited by
76
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
36.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
Keywords
digital platforms, Global South, international development, transaction platforms, innovation platforms, platform governance, digital economy, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review