Cited by 0Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Cultural HeritageLatin American socio-political dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Movements and Archaeology

Jofré, Ivana Carina·2020·Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-30018-0_1795

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bebbington, A. 2007. Minería, movimientos sociales y respuestas campesinas. Una ecología política de transformaciones territoriales. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos – Centro Peruano de Estudios Sociales.
  2. Burke, H., C. Smith, D. Lippert, J. Watkins, and L. Zimmerman, eds. 2008. Kennewick Man: Perspectives on the ancient one. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
  3. Castro Gómez, S., and E. Mendietta. 1998. Teorías sin disciplina (latinoamericanismo, poscolonialidad y globalización en debate). México: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
  4. Clark, T., and L. North. 2006. Mining and oil in Latin America: Lessons from the past, issues for the future. In Community rights and corporate responsibility. Canadian mining and oil companies in Latin America, between the lines, ed. L. North, T. Clark, and V. Patroni, 1–16. Toronto: Canada Council for the Arts, International Development Research Center.
  5. Diálogos Desde El Sur. 2007. Foro virtual: arqueología y descolonización. Arqueología Suramericana/Arqueologia Sul-Americana 3 (1): 3–19.
  6. Endere, M.L., and R.P. Curtoni. 2003. Patrimonio, arqueología y participación: acerca de la noción de paisaje arqueológico. In Análisis, interpretación y gestión en la arqueología de Sudamérica, ed. R.P. Curtoni and M.L. Endere, 277–296. Olavarría: Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.
  7. Endere, M.L., and R.P. Curtoni. 2006. Entre lonkos y “ólogos”. La participación de la comunidad indígena Rankülches de Argentina en la investigación arqueológica. Arqueología Suramericana/Arqueologia Sul-americana 2 (1): 72–92.
  8. Endere, M.L., and R.P. Curtoni. 2007. Acerca de la interacción entre la comunidad indígena Rankülche y los arqueólogos en el área centro-este de La Pampa. Quinto Sol 11: 197–205.
  9. Gordon, C. 1991. Governmental rationality. In The Faucault effect. Studies in governmentality, ed. G. Burchell et al., 1–51. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Jofré, I.C. 2013. Los pájaros nocturnos de la historia: Una arqueología indígena de las sociedades capayanas del Norte de San Juan (Rep. Argentina). Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Catamarca. San Fernando del valle de Catamarca, República Argentina.
  11. Jofré, I.C., M.B. Guirado López, S. Araya Lisette, L. Bonfatti, and P.D. Aroca Negron. 2010a. Arqueologías nativas como una elaboración colectiva y la militancia en la investigación. In Actas del XVII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología ArgentinaVolume IV, ed. R. Bárcena and H. Chiavazza, 1465–1469. Mendoza: Facultad de Filosofia y Letras UNCuyo, INCHIUSA-CONICET.
  12. Nicholas, G., ed. 2010. Being and becoming indigenous archaeologists. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
  13. Nora, P. 1984. Entre mémoire et histoire. In Les lieux de mèmoire I. La république, XV–XLII. Paris: Gallimard.
  14. Ortíz, R. 2007. Las empresas transnacionales en la minería argentina: seguridad jurídica para las empresas; inseguridad ambiental e incumplimiento de los derechos para las comunidades locales. Buenos Aires: Observatorio de las Empresas Transnacionales, FOCO.
  15. Power, T.M. 2002. Excavando hacia el desarrollo? Una visión histórica de la minería y el desarrollo. Oxfam: Dpto. de Economía de la Universidad de Montana.
  16. Schiaffini, H. 2004. La inserción de la inversión minera en las tendencias socioeconómicas de la Argentina (Revista Theomai 10). Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
  17. Smith, C., and H.M. Wobst, eds. 2005. indigenous archaeologies. Decolonizing theory and practice. London/New York: Routledge.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Jofré, I. C.
Affiliations
National University of Catamarca (AR)
Corresponding author
Jofré, Ivana Carina
Venue
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
Published
2020
Pages
9862-9870
OpenAlex
W4235049567
Cited by
0
References
18
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Latin American socio-political dynamics
Keywords
social movements, archaeology, collective action, colonialism, nation-state, academic knowledge production, employee participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review